2.7 sec in total
380 ms
1.8 sec
458 ms
Click here to check amazing Block Companies content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about blockcompanies.com
Full project engagement. Quality over quantity. Safety first and always. Unsurpassed professionalism. We build success, one relationship at a time.
Visit blockcompanies.comWe analyzed Blockcompanies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
blockcompanies.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,230 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.783
5/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
380 ms
178 ms
197 ms
29 ms
444 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Blockcompanies.com, 30% (29 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (873 ms) belongs to the original domain Blockcompanies.com.
Page size can be reduced by 339.6 kB (8%)
4.1 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Blockcompanies.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 188.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Block Companies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.5 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blockcompanies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (60%)
85
34
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Block Companies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blockcompanies.com
380 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
178 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
197 ms
utilities.css
29 ms
styles.css
444 ms
magnific_popup.css
198 ms
animate.css
311 ms
modules-style.css
367 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
245 ms
frontend.css
259 ms
front.min.css
262 ms
utilities.css
87 ms
style.min.css
266 ms
style.min.css
448 ms
css
28 ms
choices.min.css
334 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
439 ms
richtext.min.css
330 ms
content.min.css
376 ms
wpforms-modern-full.min.css
571 ms
utilities.js
6 ms
ie-compat.min.js
404 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
445 ms
utilities.js
59 ms
swiper.min.css
461 ms
diplSwiper.min.css
419 ms
style.min.css
454 ms
slick.min.css
455 ms
jquery.min.js
461 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
485 ms
submit.js
588 ms
hooks.min.js
589 ms
i18n.min.js
589 ms
index.js
589 ms
index.js
590 ms
magnific-popup.js
610 ms
slick.min.js
609 ms
counter-up.min.js
609 ms
frontend.js
609 ms
front.min.js
664 ms
scripts.min.js
873 ms
api.js
41 ms
e-202446.js
17 ms
smoothscroll.js
673 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
614 ms
recaptcha.js
595 ms
jquery.mobile.js
589 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
597 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
605 ms
common.js
593 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
545 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
533 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
538 ms
swiper.min.js
546 ms
cropped-Block_Companies_Logo.png
417 ms
Home-Page-Image-1.png
86 ms
block_logo.61e56ca352c131.93665770-1024x302.png
412 ms
RosemarysPlace.png
73 ms
RenovationsFinal.png
73 ms
CommercialFinal.png
74 ms
TenentImprove.jpg
76 ms
Ramel-Company.png
103 ms
James-D-Logo.png
135 ms
Benchmark-Logo-2.png
131 ms
NDA.png
114 ms
Moran.png
131 ms
Creekstone-Companies.png
115 ms
brand-ojala-circle.png
131 ms
Didier-Logo.png
158 ms
CST-Land-Developers.png
144 ms
ABCHou.png
131 ms
BRChamber.png
132 ms
CenterPlanning-Excellence.png
132 ms
EnergyStar.png
133 ms
GrAtlanta.png
133 ms
GeorgiaAA.png
452 ms
LAAHP.png
414 ms
NAA.png
461 ms
NAIOP2.png
459 ms
NAMCHou.png
460 ms
TAA.png
414 ms
TAHP.png
675 ms
ULI.png
697 ms
USHUD.png
726 ms
USGBC.png
737 ms
preloader.gif
271 ms
cIf5Ma1dtE0zSiGSiED7AXEBuIk.woff
41 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN58AfvNeKBU.woff
49 ms
flU8Rqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN5fzXeA.woff
57 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59Yf_NeKBU.woff
58 ms
flU-Rqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN5-QbeR5Cw.woff
58 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59IePNeKBU.woff
57 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59wevNeKBU.woff
105 ms
modules.woff
226 ms
et-divi-dynamic-4-late.css
217 ms
style.min.css
86 ms
modules.woff
77 ms
blockcompanies.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
blockcompanies.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
blockcompanies.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blockcompanies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blockcompanies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blockcompanies.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Block Companies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: