Tools & Wizards About Us
blueink.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 63% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

blueink.me

BlueInk CMS Testing - Home

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

438 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

345 ms

blueink.me screenshot

About Website

Visit blueink.me now to see the best up-to-date Blue Ink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blueink.me

BlueInk CMS is a browser-based, AJAX-enabled, Web 2.0, buzz-word-compatible Content Management System.

Visit blueink.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Blueink.me page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blueink.me performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

blueink.me

438 ms

v2basic.1500668787.css

163 ms

higherground.1321394124.css

314 ms

AC_Quicktime.1500668786.js

170 ms

embed.1500668786.js

170 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Blueink.me, 3% (1 request) were made to Rum-static.pingdom.net and 3% (1 request) were made to Js-agent.newrelic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Blueink.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

61.7 kB

After Optimization

51.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Blueink.me main page is 61.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 35.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 188 B

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 35.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Ink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (61%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Ink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

blueink.me

blueink.me

438 ms

v2basic.1500668787.css

v2basic.1500668787.css

163 ms

higherground.1321394124.css

higherground.1321394124.css

314 ms

AC_Quicktime.1500668786.js

AC_Quicktime.1500668786.js

170 ms

embed.1500668786.js

embed.1500668786.js

170 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.1500668786.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.1500668786.js

219 ms

jquery.ui.core.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.core.1500668786.js

173 ms

jquery.ui.widget.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.widget.1500668786.js

281 ms

jquery.ui.mouse.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.mouse.1500668786.js

269 ms

jquery.ui.position.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.position.1500668786.js

1049 ms

jquery.ui.autocomplete.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.autocomplete.1500668786.js

268 ms

jquery.ui.sortable.1500668786.js

jquery.ui.sortable.1500668786.js

2082 ms

jquery.lazy.min.1526998553.js

jquery.lazy.min.1526998553.js

2081 ms

jquery.tagcloud.1500668786.js

jquery.tagcloud.1500668786.js

3117 ms

mootools-1.2.5-core-yc.1500668786.js

mootools-1.2.5-core-yc.1500668786.js

3124 ms

mootools-1.2.4.4-more-yc.1500668786.js

mootools-1.2.4.4-more-yc.1500668786.js

3174 ms

inflector.1500668786.js

inflector.1500668786.js

3116 ms

slimbox.1500668787.css

slimbox.1500668787.css

4133 ms

slimbox.1500668786.js

slimbox.1500668786.js

4135 ms

v2frontend.1500668786.js

v2frontend.1500668786.js

4140 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

45 ms

content.jpg

content.jpg

3796 ms

top-bg.jpg

top-bg.jpg

3810 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

3798 ms

header-photo.jpg

header-photo.jpg

3875 ms

nav.jpg

nav.jpg

3876 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

4690 ms

footer-bottom.jpg

footer-bottom.jpg

4737 ms

nr-1153.min.js

nr-1153.min.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

blueink.me accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

blueink.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

blueink.me SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blueink.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Blueink.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

blueink.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blue Ink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: