Tools & Wizards About Us
bluepillow.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

bluepillow.com

BluePillow - The Best Holiday Rentals, Apartments, Houses & Villas

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

380 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

362 ms

bluepillow.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bluepillow.com homepage info - get ready to check Blue Pillow best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bluepillow.com

Browse hundreds of thousands of holiday rental apartments, villas and cottages from around the world at the best price with Bluepillow.

Visit bluepillow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluepillow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluepillow.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,320 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bluepillow.com

380 ms

www.bluepillow.com

845 ms

gtm.js

110 ms

en.json

397 ms

sis6scm.css

483 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Bluepillow.com, 18% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 14% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) belongs to the original domain Bluepillow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 551.5 kB (64%)

Content Size

859.4 kB

After Optimization

307.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bluepillow.com main page is 859.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 640.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 549.4 kB

  • Original 640.5 kB
  • After minification 618.1 kB
  • After compression 91.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 549.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 86.2 kB
  • After minification 84.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blue Pillow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 179 B

  • Original 132.0 kB
  • After minification 132.0 kB
  • After compression 131.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 349 B

  • Original 722 B
  • After minification 722 B
  • After compression 373 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluepillow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349 B or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blue Pillow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bluepillow.com

bluepillow.com

380 ms

www.bluepillow.com

www.bluepillow.com

845 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

110 ms

en.json

en.json

397 ms

sis6scm.css

sis6scm.css

483 ms

ads.js

ads.js

136 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

136 ms

js

js

36 ms

js

js

54 ms

deps.65c0d5bc5895612a8f7f.js

deps.65c0d5bc5895612a8f7f.js

242 ms

vendor.2029db8787c88de2ba58.js

vendor.2029db8787c88de2ba58.js

398 ms

app.1f5736b5fb73d39cbb16.js

app.1f5736b5fb73d39cbb16.js

425 ms

pp-img.jpg

pp-img.jpg

134 ms

bluepillow-logo.svg

bluepillow-logo.svg

129 ms

hiw-ico-sh.png

hiw-ico-sh.png

301 ms

d

d

195 ms

d

d

196 ms

d

d

304 ms

d

d

195 ms

d

d

333 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

162 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

187 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

242 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

183 ms

js

js

119 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

224 ms

landing

landing

113 ms

794853407345980

794853407345980

15 ms

Accessibility Review

bluepillow.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bluepillow.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bluepillow.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluepillow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluepillow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bluepillow.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blue Pillow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: