9 sec in total
38 ms
8.7 sec
229 ms
Click here to check amazing Bodhtree content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bodhtree.com
Visit bodhtree.comWe analyzed Bodhtree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
bodhtree.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.239
52/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
38 ms
4492 ms
255 ms
970 ms
965 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Bodhtree.com, 15% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bodhtree.com.
Page size can be reduced by 126.0 kB (9%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bodhtree.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 675.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 920 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bodhtree images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 770 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodhtree.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (66%)
76
26
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodhtree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bodhtree.com
38 ms
bodhtree.com
4492 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
255 ms
style.min.css
970 ms
classic-themes.min.css
965 ms
styles.css
966 ms
rs6.css
990 ms
job-listings.css
965 ms
general.min.css
499 ms
style.min.css
735 ms
wpsm-style.css
985 ms
frontend.min.css
1261 ms
flatpickr.min.css
1219 ms
select2.min.css
1223 ms
amination.css
1252 ms
js_composer.min.css
1303 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1335 ms
font-awesome-animation.min.css
1462 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1484 ms
styles.min.css
1495 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1497 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
1559 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.css
1587 ms
slick.min.css
1718 ms
style.min.css
2037 ms
9520.css
1739 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1755 ms
general.min.css
1850 ms
css
50 ms
jquery.min.js
2115 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1960 ms
flatpickr.min.js
1984 ms
select2.min.js
1998 ms
js
78 ms
css
66 ms
vc-customize.min.css
2092 ms
partner-carousel.min.css
2292 ms
testimonial.min.css
2294 ms
index.js
2295 ms
index.js
2296 ms
rbtools.min.js
2594 ms
rs6.min.js
2858 ms
script.min.js
2208 ms
wpsm-script.js
1752 ms
frontend.min.js
1537 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1572 ms
plugin.min.js
2015 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
2008 ms
slick.min.js
1800 ms
main.min.js
1858 ms
general.min.js
1742 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1866 ms
vc_extend.min.js
1858 ms
app.min.js
1944 ms
rpa-banner.png
141 ms
logo-sticky.png
819 ms
analytics-home-banner.jpg
919 ms
digital-banner-home-slider-v2-1.jpg
918 ms
cloud-home-banner-1-1.gif
920 ms
erp-home-banner.gif
920 ms
equipp-hme-banner-1.jpg
921 ms
mobility-banner-home-slider-v2.jpg
920 ms
award-hm-img6.png
921 ms
award-hm-img7.png
922 ms
award-hm-img8.png
922 ms
award-hm-img2.png
923 ms
award-hm-img3.png
923 ms
award-hm-img4.png
924 ms
award-hm-img5.png
923 ms
award-hm-img1.png
924 ms
qats-logo.jpg
924 ms
sunpharma-logo.jpg
925 ms
cloud-physcics-logo-1.png
836 ms
FICCI_logo-e1517901031278.png
790 ms
press-mart-logo.png
786 ms
dr-reddys-logo.png
786 ms
pennar-logo.png
741 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
19 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
48 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
65 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
69 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
68 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
67 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
67 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf
66 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
68 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
70 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
71 ms
megatron.woff
1682 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
976 ms
travel-logo.jpg
574 ms
bodhtree.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bodhtree.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bodhtree.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodhtree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bodhtree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bodhtree.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bodhtree. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: