7.8 sec in total
282 ms
7.4 sec
132 ms
Visit bodygard.net now to see the best up-to-date Bodygard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodygard.net
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit bodygard.netWe analyzed Bodygard.net page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
bodygard.net performance score
282 ms
192 ms
39 ms
21 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bodygard.net, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Buydomains.com.
Page size can be reduced by 844.3 kB (64%)
1.3 MB
466.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bodygard.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 935.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bodygard needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 616.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 616.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodygard.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (74%)
87
23
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bodygard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bodygard.net
282 ms
monetate.js
192 ms
application.css
39 ms
ng-modal.css
21 ms
angular.min.js
34 ms
ng-modal.js
20 ms
google_analytics.js
20 ms
google_oauth.js
20 ms
bold_chat.js
24 ms
eloqua.js
23 ms
hotjar.js
23 ms
adroll.js
27 ms
impactRadius.js
28 ms
in.js
37 ms
api.js
48 ms
api:client.js
64 ms
app.js
25 ms
cookies.js
25 ms
socialMedia.js
28 ms
countryDropdown.js
29 ms
monetate.js
31 ms
index.js
27 ms
lander.js
27 ms
seoPages.js
30 ms
sitePages.js
31 ms
search.js
28 ms
modal.js
30 ms
forms.js
29 ms
tldSelector.js
31 ms
setFixedTop.js
30 ms
searchBar.js
29 ms
currency.js
32 ms
trust.js
32 ms
conversion.js
30 ms
lander-v2.css
33 ms
tdfs-inner.css
32 ms
tdfs-temp.css
32 ms
thankyou.css
32 ms
entry.js
8 ms
custom.js
17 ms
css
30 ms
fontawesome.min.css
15 ms
bd-icons.min.css
16 ms
ga.js
24 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
24 ms
userspace
233 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
75 ms
recaptcha__en.js
284 ms
all.js
48 ms
280 ms
ss-social-regular.css
65 ms
css
63 ms
logo-header-2x.png
37 ms
__utm.gif
248 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
179 ms
__utm.gif
211 ms
309 ms
postmessageRelay
233 ms
139007652-0
208 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
122 ms
5354 ms
hotjar-10205.js
85 ms
elqCfg.min.js
79 ms
__utm.gif
64 ms
xd_arbiter.php
60 ms
xd_arbiter.php
118 ms
collect
5261 ms
49 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
57 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
78 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
92 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
92 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
78 ms
framework
53 ms
anchor
61 ms
svrGP
98 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
91 ms
iframe
29 ms
139007652-1
46 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
69 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
62 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
5187 ms
styles__ltr.css
5154 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5133 ms
xd_arbiter.php
67 ms
logo_48.png
36 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
20 ms
webworker.js
28 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
51 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
53 ms
recaptcha__en.js
7 ms
iframerpc
33 ms
vms.js
630 ms
__utm.gif
5 ms
roundtrip.js
10 ms
visit-data
218 ms
6ESKICLQUVAGDN5NI2ETS4.js
281 ms
bc.pv
80 ms
bodygard.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodygard.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bodygard.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bodygard.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bodygard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: