Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk

Body Health Debate | Embrace The Healthy Life

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Body Health Debate content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bodyhealthdebate.co.uk

Visit bodyhealthdebate.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk

272 ms

www.tennismind.co.uk

647 ms

www.rpdt.co.uk

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk, 33% (1 request) were made to Tennismind.co.uk and 33% (1 request) were made to Rpdt.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) relates to the external source Tennismind.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19 B (15%)

Content Size

128 B

After Optimization

109 B

In fact, the total size of Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk main page is 128 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 128 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 128 B
  • After minification 128 B
  • After compression 109 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bodyhealthdebate.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bodyhealthdebate.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Body Health Debate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: