2.4 sec in total
664 ms
1.6 sec
141 ms
Click here to check amazing Borl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about borl.in
A jewel in the crown of Madhya pradesh - current image of night refiner used
Visit borl.inWe analyzed Borl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 664 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
borl.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value38.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.87
4/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
664 ms
328 ms
24 ms
187 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Borl.in, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) belongs to the original domain Borl.in.
Page size can be reduced by 309.4 kB (23%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Borl.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 989.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Borl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 187.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Borl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)
31
19
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Borl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
borl.in
664 ms
default.aspx
328 ms
css
24 ms
base.css
187 ms
skdslider.css
96 ms
screen.css
100 ms
jquery.min.js
259 ms
standard.js
248 ms
navigation.css
61 ms
skdslider.js
82 ms
news-scroller.js
96 ms
body-back.jpg
136 ms
logo.jpg
135 ms
email_icon.jpg
130 ms
print_icon.jpg
132 ms
hindi_text.jpg
132 ms
1_Menu_refinery.jpg
165 ms
39_Menu_refinery.jpg
163 ms
2_Menu_refinery.jpg
134 ms
6_Menu_refinery.jpg
212 ms
Header_slide1.jpg
219 ms
Header_slide2_New.jpg
270 ms
Header_slide3_new.jpg
211 ms
Header_slide4_new.jpg
297 ms
Header_slide5_new.jpg
334 ms
LHeader_IMG_5801.JPG
310 ms
LHeader_Environment.JPG
283 ms
LHeader_Products.JPG
317 ms
LHeader_TouchingLives.JPG
322 ms
sprite.png
212 ms
slide-bg-active.png
225 ms
slide-bg.png
229 ms
slide_desc.png
245 ms
borl.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
borl.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
borl.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Borl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Borl.in main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
borl.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Borl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: