18.2 sec in total
2.7 sec
13.8 sec
1.7 sec
Visit brandcosmetic.ru now to see the best up-to-date Brandcosmetic content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about brandcosmetic.ru
Visit brandcosmetic.ruWe analyzed Brandcosmetic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 15.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
brandcosmetic.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value24.8 s
0/100
10%
Value26,150 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value35.1 s
0/100
10%
2693 ms
1259 ms
727 ms
792 ms
1648 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Brandcosmetic.ru, 2% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Brandcosmetic.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 617.4 kB (27%)
2.3 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Brandcosmetic.ru main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Brandcosmetic needs image optimization as it can save up to 243.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 261.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandcosmetic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (33%)
103
69
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brandcosmetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brandcosmetic.ru
2693 ms
style.css
1259 ms
rotator_style.css
727 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
792 ms
jquery.min.js
1648 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1255 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1638 ms
mobilyslider.js
1255 ms
init.js
1255 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
1635 ms
callme.js
1645 ms
ajax_cart.js
1643 ms
jquery.rater.js
1644 ms
jquery-inset.js
1642 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1950 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
1964 ms
ctrlnavigate.js
1963 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1962 ms
ajax_wishlist.js
1963 ms
jquery-ui.js
1631 ms
jquery-ui.css
655 ms
baloon.js
3441 ms
baloon.css
2132 ms
jquery.autocomplete-min.js
2139 ms
reset.css
890 ms
site-8_01.jpg
750 ms
site-8_03.jpg
468 ms
phone-logo.png
222 ms
Zvonok.png
220 ms
logo-line.png
223 ms
wish-list.png
224 ms
cart.png
321 ms
new.png
325 ms
percent2.png
368 ms
St-Moriz.gif
7734 ms
Dessata.gif
1232 ms
Selective.jpg
1405 ms
Lucas.jpg
946 ms
1_03.jpg
646 ms
Kueshi_(1).gif
2972 ms
Eos(5).gif
4286 ms
beauty_blender.jpg
3310 ms
Invisibobble3.jpg
2552 ms
PCA.png
599 ms
Kueshi2.jpg
738 ms
Senscience.png
953 ms
BbLab.png
899 ms
Algotherm.png
1038 ms
Charme_D_orient.png
1222 ms
St_Moris.png
1105 ms
Dikson.png
1190 ms
Barex.png
1568 ms
Nioxin.png
2884 ms
Selective.png
1621 ms
Brandkvadrat.png
3531 ms
Debora_Cosmetics.jpg
2813 ms
endocare.png
2157 ms
Christina.png
2648 ms
Cannaan.png
2399 ms
SkinDoctors.png
2546 ms
v2
2304 ms
Joico.png
2872 ms
watch.js
85 ms
RtueHQGv0K
237 ms
KelsonSansLightRU.woff
3069 ms
config.js
2750 ms
CND.png
3710 ms
Loreal.png
2842 ms
Gehwol.png
3525 ms
Tigi.png
3054 ms
Schwarzkopf.png
3081 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
229 ms
Revlon.png
3292 ms
Hualual.png
3171 ms
Organic%20Ocean.jpg
3187 ms
Heliocare.png
3439 ms
Crew.png
3605 ms
Orofluido.png
6522 ms
Moroccanoil.png
6253 ms
Wella%20SP.png
3311 ms
Kerastase.png
3499 ms
Evolut.png
3696 ms
LAKME.png
5959 ms
Sebastian.png
3506 ms
Wella%20PRO.png
3691 ms
BFM_Link_BCS1.png
6870 ms
BFM_Link_OSH1.png
3514 ms
delivery-icon.png
3739 ms
garant.png
3383 ms
tracker.giftd.ru
945 ms
pixel
953 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
watch.js
6 ms
vk-orange.png
3311 ms
collect.js
340 ms
collect
145 ms
collect
349 ms
fb-orange.png
3330 ms
rate.jpg
5189 ms
plata.png
5050 ms
ga-audiences
80 ms
glass.png
4504 ms
errow-1.png
4566 ms
hr.png
4681 ms
style.css
4628 ms
form.html
4741 ms
bttn.png
146 ms
brandcosmetic.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
brandcosmetic.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
brandcosmetic.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandcosmetic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Brandcosmetic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brandcosmetic.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brandcosmetic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: