Tools & Wizards About Us
breakerbakerltd.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

Website On Hold

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

312 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

261 ms

breakerbakerltd.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to breakerbakerltd.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Breakerbakerltd best content right away, or after learning these important things about breakerbakerltd.co.uk

Website on Hold

Visit breakerbakerltd.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Breakerbakerltd.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

breakerbakerltd.co.uk performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.627

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

312 ms

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

348 ms

css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

animate.css

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Breakerbakerltd.co.uk, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (783 ms) belongs to the original domain Breakerbakerltd.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.1 kB (1%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Breakerbakerltd.co.uk main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Breakerbakerltd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 237.3 kB
  • After minification 237.2 kB
  • After compression 231.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 45.5 kB
  • After minification 45.5 kB
  • After compression 39.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Breakerbakerltd.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Breakerbakerltd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

312 ms

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

348 ms

css

css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

animate.css

animate.css

88 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

184 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

241 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

242 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

bootstrap-datepicker.css

242 ms

jquery.timepicker.css

jquery.timepicker.css

244 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

243 ms

style.css

style.css

362 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

501 ms

jquery-migrate-3.0.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.0.1.min.js

326 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

326 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

417 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

328 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

415 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

417 ms

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

417 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

456 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

495 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

524 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

498 ms

scrollax.min.js

scrollax.min.js

580 ms

js

js

62 ms

google-map.js

google-map.js

535 ms

main.js

main.js

576 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

741 ms

image_1.jpg

image_1.jpg

526 ms

image_2.jpg

image_2.jpg

530 ms

image_3.jpg

image_3.jpg

499 ms

work-1.jpg

work-1.jpg

734 ms

work-2.jpg

work-2.jpg

783 ms

work-3.jpg

work-3.jpg

777 ms

work-4.jpg

work-4.jpg

590 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

19 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

26 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

10 ms

bg_1.jpg

bg_1.jpg

462 ms

bg_2.jpg

bg_2.jpg

461 ms

Accessibility Review

breakerbakerltd.co.uk accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

breakerbakerltd.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

breakerbakerltd.co.uk SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Breakerbakerltd.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Breakerbakerltd.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

breakerbakerltd.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Breakerbakerltd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: