4.1 sec in total
561 ms
3.1 sec
434 ms
Welcome to bridg.com homepage info - get ready to check Bridg best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bridg.com
Go beyond loyalty data and increase customer engagement by identifying unknown in-store customers with our exclusive offline identity resolution capabilities.
Visit bridg.comWe analyzed Bridg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 561 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bridg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value16,060 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value23.1 s
1/100
10%
561 ms
26 ms
73 ms
76 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Bridg.com, 8% (9 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bridg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (68%)
3.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Bridg.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bridg needs image optimization as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 985.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 985.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (78%)
89
20
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bridg.com
561 ms
css
26 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
layerslider.css
76 ms
css
15 ms
ihover.css
107 ms
frontend-render.css
121 ms
style.css
76 ms
font-awesome.min.css
101 ms
stylesheet.min.css
172 ms
style_dynamic.php
486 ms
responsive.min.css
126 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
552 ms
js_composer.css
210 ms
custom_css.php
524 ms
style.css
147 ms
masterslider.main.css
201 ms
custom.css
205 ms
addtoany.min.css
237 ms
jquery.js
274 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
244 ms
inboundAnalytics.min.js
253 ms
greensock.js
281 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
324 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
311 ms
api.min.js
6 ms
scripts.js
316 ms
froogaloop.min.js
345 ms
cta-variation.js
352 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
359 ms
jcarousel.responsive.js
380 ms
jcarouselresponsive.css
371 ms
style-admin.css
378 ms
qode-like.js
399 ms
plugins.js
512 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
452 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
431 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
467 ms
default_dynamic.php
1007 ms
default.min.js
502 ms
custom_js.php
965 ms
comment-reply.min.js
490 ms
js_composer_front.js
498 ms
style.css
449 ms
2b6734
19 ms
logo-top.png
97 ms
white_logos_greasemonkey-1024x100.png
99 ms
icon1.png
97 ms
icon2.png
97 ms
icon3.png
101 ms
laptop-screen.png
98 ms
logo-footer.png
98 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
home3.jpg
298 ms
2C65E7_1_0.woff
223 ms
exljbris_-_museo-300-webfont.woff
627 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
35 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
39 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
72 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
72 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
72 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
69 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
220 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
218 ms
page.js
16 ms
conversion_async.js
48 ms
insight.min.js
10 ms
roundtrip.js
39 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
i.js
16 ms
fe069e8b10e076575b69335acb374581449323f5.1.js
156 ms
fs.js
166 ms
228531
75 ms
webfont.js
55 ms
newest_banner.jpg
389 ms
social_share_blue.png
54 ms
logo.png
55 ms
collect
103 ms
collect
163 ms
150 ms
css
97 ms
e53d711b96b41445468830-CMO-guide-C.jpg
203 ms
page
379 ms
TJMCQWQI6ZEP5GHXH7I2VW.js
309 ms
78 ms
exljbris_-_museo-300-webfont.ttf
574 ms
50 ms
out
39 ms
tr
120 ms
76 ms
out
43 ms
out
49 ms
out
49 ms
out
53 ms
out
52 ms
out
51 ms
out
53 ms
u.php
93 ms
adsct
115 ms
sync
32 ms
pixel
63 ms
41 ms
l
63 ms
sd
30 ms
377928.gif
28 ms
in
19 ms
pd.js
14 ms
exljbris_-_museo-300-webfont.svg
411 ms
analytics
321 ms
analytics
233 ms
bridg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bridg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bridg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bridg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: