6.2 sec in total
814 ms
4.8 sec
543 ms
Click here to check amazing Bridgelink content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgelink.jp
翻訳会社ブリッジリンクは、日英・英日ほか多言語で、そのまま使える翻訳をお届けする会社です。契約書・マニュアル・ウェブサイトなど、実務・技術翻訳を高品質でリーズナブルな料金でご提供する翻訳会社です。
Visit bridgelink.jpWe analyzed Bridgelink.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bridgelink.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value1.138
1/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
814 ms
720 ms
898 ms
1143 ms
931 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgelink.jp, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Bridgelink.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 84.9 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Bridgelink.jp main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 977.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridgelink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgelink.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (16%)
86
72
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridgelink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bridgelink.jp
814 ms
bridgelink.jp
720 ms
import.css
898 ms
jquery.js
1143 ms
jquery.cookie.js
931 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
931 ms
jquery.heightLine.js
904 ms
switch.js
910 ms
common.js
1132 ms
js
55 ms
ytag.js
697 ms
normalize.css
187 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
194 ms
master.css
214 ms
block.css
215 ms
sp.css
370 ms
analytics.js
171 ms
logo.png
182 ms
bg.gif
181 ms
arw_blue.png
189 ms
border.gif
189 ms
mainvisual01.jpg
852 ms
bg_slider01.png
176 ms
mainvisual02.jpg
1405 ms
bg_slider02.png
348 ms
bg_sub_h2.jpg
767 ms
bg_h2.gif
367 ms
bg_blue_corner.gif
371 ms
ico_blue01.gif
521 ms
ico_blue02.gif
550 ms
ico_blue03.gif
551 ms
ico_blue04.gif
694 ms
ico_blue05.gif
730 ms
bg_green_corner.gif
733 ms
ico_green01.gif
868 ms
ico_green02.gif
909 ms
ico_green03.gif
915 ms
ico_green04.gif
950 ms
ico_green05.gif
1024 ms
ico_green06.gif
1040 ms
ico_question.gif
1089 ms
bg_question.gif
1099 ms
ico_answer.gif
1133 ms
bg_example01.gif
1198 ms
bg_example02.gif
1214 ms
bg_example03.gif
1270 ms
bg_example04.gif
1283 ms
bg_example05.gif
1319 ms
sitemap_arrow.gif
1372 ms
bg_side_h3.gif
1386 ms
contact.png
349 ms
tel.png
511 ms
h2_slider01.png
523 ms
txt_slider01.png
530 ms
btn_slider_off.png
531 ms
h2_slider02.png
535 ms
txt_slider02.png
534 ms
img_slide01.jpg
1528 ms
img_slide02.jpg
1544 ms
img_reason01.jpg
883 ms
bg_reason01.png
709 ms
img_reason02.jpg
712 ms
bg_reason02.png
712 ms
img_reason03.jpg
1062 ms
bg_reason03.png
892 ms
img_reason04.jpg
1067 ms
bg_reason04.png
1061 ms
img_reason05.jpg
1246 ms
bg_reason05.png
1240 ms
img_reason06.jpg
1415 ms
bg_reason06.png
1245 ms
logo_contact.gif
1418 ms
f_logo.gif
1425 ms
f_mail.gif
1425 ms
f_tel.gif
1595 ms
f_hour.gif
1597 ms
f_tap.gif
1606 ms
bnr_side01.gif
1604 ms
bnr_side02.gif
1705 ms
bnr_side03.gif
1719 ms
bnr_side04.gif
1774 ms
bnr_side05.gif
1774 ms
bnr_side06.gif
1789 ms
bnr_side07.gif
1784 ms
rss.gif
1885 ms
controls.png
1289 ms
collect
12 ms
js
50 ms
error.html
353 ms
error.html
180 ms
bridgelink.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bridgelink.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bridgelink.jp SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
JA
![]()
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgelink.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgelink.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridgelink.jp
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bridgelink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: