2.8 sec in total
566 ms
2 sec
154 ms
Visit bridgepointroadmarkings.com now to see the best up-to-date Bridgepoint Road Markings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bridgepointroadmarkings.com
Visit bridgepointroadmarkings.comWe analyzed Bridgepointroadmarkings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 566 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
bridgepointroadmarkings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.115
86/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
566 ms
157 ms
159 ms
159 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgepointroadmarkings.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) belongs to the original domain Bridgepointroadmarkings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 265.6 kB (38%)
707.1 kB
441.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Bridgepointroadmarkings.com main page is 707.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 333.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridgepoint Road Markings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 149.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgepointroadmarkings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (69%)
52
16
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridgepoint Road Markings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bridgepointroadmarkings.com
566 ms
style.css
157 ms
colorbox.css
159 ms
styles.css
159 ms
cli-style.css
160 ms
cli-tables.css
163 ms
awesome-font.css
233 ms
wp-paginate.css
236 ms
featured-page-widget.css
238 ms
jquery.js
556 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
242 ms
jquery.cookie.js
243 ms
cookielawinfo.js
310 ms
comment-reply.js
314 ms
rd-documentlinks-styles.css
317 ms
style.css
251 ms
jquery.form.js
246 ms
scripts.js
228 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
235 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
238 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.min.js
307 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.min.js
314 ms
hoverIntent.js
318 ms
jquery.superfish.js
326 ms
view.min.js
327 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
384 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
392 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-5.5.3-packed.js
476 ms
jquery.init.js
439 ms
ga.js
35 ms
menu-dash.png
100 ms
banner.png
552 ms
key-clients-3.jpg
155 ms
dotted-border.png
99 ms
02.png
247 ms
line-marking-progress-180x110.jpg
218 ms
line-removal-hydro-180x110.jpg
244 ms
construction-line-logo.jpg
164 ms
Aslec-Logo.jpg
232 ms
RSMAlogo.jpg
246 ms
CEF-Logo.jpg
297 ms
NQA-ISO-9001-Logo.jpg
310 ms
NQA-ISO-14001-logo.jpg
324 ms
NQA-OHSAS-18001-Logo.jpg
328 ms
pdficon.gif
326 ms
search.png
377 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
443 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
overlay.png
311 ms
controls.png
311 ms
border.png
314 ms
loading_background.png
361 ms
loading.gif
391 ms
overlay.png
390 ms
undefined
561 ms
arrow-down.png
441 ms
bridgepointroadmarkings.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
bridgepointroadmarkings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
bridgepointroadmarkings.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgepointroadmarkings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgepointroadmarkings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridgepointroadmarkings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bridgepoint Road Markings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: