Tools & Wizards About Us
bridgeportresort.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bridgeportresort.net

Bridgeport Waterfront Resort | Door County Lodging on the Waterfront

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

670 ms

Page Rendered

363 ms

bridgeportresort.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bridgeport Resort content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgeportresort.net

Discover comfort and charm at Bridgeport Waterfront Resort in Door County, WI. Enjoy spacious suites with full kitchens, an indoor pool, and beautiful waterfront views--perfect for family vacations, r...

Visit bridgeportresort.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bridgeportresort.net page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bridgeportresort.net performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bridgeportresort.net

149 ms

www.bridgeportresort.net

33 ms

www.bridgeportresort.net

197 ms

themeAllycolorPaletteCustom-b12dc44d2b2bc9fe1c72a09e4e0a21d3.css

65 ms

swiper.min.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgeportresort.net, 42% (13 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 19% (6 requests) were made to Webbox-assets.siteminder.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) relates to the external source Canvas.siteminder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.4 kB (37%)

Content Size

218.9 kB

After Optimization

137.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bridgeportresort.net main page is 218.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 93.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 492 B

  • Original 45.5 kB
  • After minification 45.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridgeport Resort images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 712 B

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 79.5 kB
  • After compression 78.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgeportresort.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (63%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridgeport Resort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bridgeportresort.net

bridgeportresort.net

149 ms

www.bridgeportresort.net

www.bridgeportresort.net

33 ms

www.bridgeportresort.net

www.bridgeportresort.net

197 ms

themeAllycolorPaletteCustom-b12dc44d2b2bc9fe1c72a09e4e0a21d3.css

themeAllycolorPaletteCustom-b12dc44d2b2bc9fe1c72a09e4e0a21d3.css

65 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

51 ms

photoswipe.css

photoswipe.css

50 ms

default-skin.css

default-skin.css

51 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

39 ms

leaflet.js

leaflet.js

64 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

55 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

50 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

52 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

216 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

185 ms

vanillaTextMask.min.js

vanillaTextMask.min.js

185 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

61 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

216 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

214 ms

css-vars-ponyfill@2

css-vars-ponyfill@2

216 ms

a11y-utils.compressed.js

a11y-utils.compressed.js

256 ms

web.compressed.js

web.compressed.js

244 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

171 ms

8999ad45-155b-46e1-ba3c-33b0d615394d.jpg

8999ad45-155b-46e1-ba3c-33b0d615394d.jpg

164 ms

close-d9d2d0b1308cb694aa8116915592e2a9.png

close-d9d2d0b1308cb694aa8116915592e2a9.png

50 ms

loading-2299ad0b3f63413f026dfec20c205b8f.gif

loading-2299ad0b3f63413f026dfec20c205b8f.gif

59 ms

prev-84b76dee6b27b795e89e3649078a11c2.png

prev-84b76dee6b27b795e89e3649078a11c2.png

61 ms

next-31f15875975aab69085470aabbfec802.png

next-31f15875975aab69085470aabbfec802.png

71 ms

310c46cf-1c8c-4221-9906-4d92b980f9a2.jpg

310c46cf-1c8c-4221-9906-4d92b980f9a2.jpg

106 ms

fontawesome-webfont-c8ddf1e5e5bf3682bc7bebf30f394148.woff

fontawesome-webfont-c8ddf1e5e5bf3682bc7bebf30f394148.woff

72 ms

8eca3491-7d12-4088-bd8d-a4a36b0b47e5.jpg

8eca3491-7d12-4088-bd8d-a4a36b0b47e5.jpg

43 ms

8e86b4fa-b50d-44a6-9c0a-c18bed361c7f.jpg

8e86b4fa-b50d-44a6-9c0a-c18bed361c7f.jpg

45 ms

Accessibility Review

bridgeportresort.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Best Practices

bridgeportresort.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bridgeportresort.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgeportresort.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgeportresort.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bridgeportresort.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bridgeport Resort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: