Tools & Wizards About Us
britrail.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

britrail.net

Home - BritRail Passes

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

461 ms

britrail.net screenshot

About Website

Visit britrail.net now to see the best up-to-date Brit Rail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about britrail.net

The best way to explore England, Scotland and Wales is with a BritRail pass, allowing for unlimited train travel on Britain’s National Rail Network!

Visit britrail.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Britrail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

britrail.net performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,550 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

britrail.net

1263 ms

frontend.css

350 ms

styles.css

175 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

179 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Britrail.net, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Britrail.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (48%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Britrail.net main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 96.9 kB

  • Original 119.3 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 897.2 kB
  • After minification 874.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brit Rail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 768.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 545.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 768.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 492.7 kB

  • Original 575.2 kB
  • After minification 547.6 kB
  • After compression 82.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Britrail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 492.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (82%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brit Rail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

britrail.net

britrail.net

1263 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

350 ms

styles.css

styles.css

175 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

179 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

240 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

471 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

235 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

233 ms

global.css

global.css

292 ms

post-130.css

post-130.css

291 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

298 ms

post-35.css

post-35.css

300 ms

style.css

style.css

350 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

349 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

354 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

351 ms

style.css

style.css

354 ms

css

css

35 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

461 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

407 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

406 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

406 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

521 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

464 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

357 ms

classic-071822.css

classic-071822.css

34 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

69 ms

css

css

27 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

356 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

576 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

411 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

513 ms

index.js

index.js

512 ms

index.js

index.js

512 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

686 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

605 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

575 ms

api.js

api.js

67 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

575 ms

index.js

index.js

574 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

601 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

601 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

543 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

540 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

566 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

563 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

562 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

175 ms

logo_britrail.png

logo_britrail.png

247 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

246 ms

BRP-BREP-North-Tics.jpg

BRP-BREP-North-Tics.jpg

395 ms

BRP-GWW-BRSWP-Bradford-upon-Avon.jpg

BRP-GWW-BRSWP-Bradford-upon-Avon.jpg

540 ms

BRP-SCOT.jpg

BRP-SCOT.jpg

393 ms

BRP-BREP-North.jpg

BRP-BREP-North.jpg

393 ms

maxresdefault-5.jpg

maxresdefault-5.jpg

334 ms

footer-bg-1.png

footer-bg-1.png

263 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

92 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

127 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

170 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

174 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

174 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

175 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

352 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

235 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

264 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

265 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

100 ms

Accessibility Review

britrail.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

britrail.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

britrail.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Britrail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Britrail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

britrail.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brit Rail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: