4 sec in total
505 ms
2.9 sec
553 ms
Visit brokerage-review.com now to see the best up-to-date Brokerage Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about brokerage-review.com
Comprehensive online brokerage reviews and ratings for 2024. U.S. stock broker dealers and investing companies rankings.
Visit brokerage-review.comWe analyzed Brokerage-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
brokerage-review.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value9.6 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.113
87/100
15%
Value12.5 s
15/100
10%
505 ms
147 ms
293 ms
230 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Brokerage-review.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to Ws.sharethis.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (899 ms) belongs to the original domain Brokerage-review.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)
2.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Brokerage-review.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brokerage Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brokerage-review.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (43%)
100
57
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brokerage Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.brokerage-review.com
505 ms
style.css
147 ms
style2.css
293 ms
buttons.js
230 ms
WebResource.axd
246 ms
ScriptResource.axd
514 ms
ScriptResource.axd
379 ms
adsbygoogle.js
26 ms
LogoBrokerage.jpg
164 ms
Search-icon.png
111 ms
trading3.png
382 ms
ameritrade-200.gif
151 ms
4halfstar.png
166 ms
ally-invest.png
216 ms
TradeStation.jpg
283 ms
charles-schwab.png
282 ms
fidelity-150.jpg
283 ms
Scottrade-150.png
381 ms
etrade.png
401 ms
ib.jpg
401 ms
3halfstar.png
400 ms
merrilledge.jpg
404 ms
vanguard.png
460 ms
motif-125.jpg
459 ms
capital-one-investing.png
484 ms
firstrade.jpg
488 ms
usaa.jpg
482 ms
3star.png
485 ms
Lightspeed.jpg
559 ms
ChoiceTrade.jpg
545 ms
Wells-fargo.jpg
570 ms
sogotrade.jpg
571 ms
Cobra.jpg
572 ms
Kapitall.jpg
622 ms
TradingBlock.jpg
634 ms
MurielSiebert.jpg
652 ms
2star.png
667 ms
SpeedTrader.jpg
660 ms
Just2trade.jpg
667 ms
msn.jpg
899 ms
zacks.jpg
899 ms
async-buttons.js
22 ms
pview
16 ms
FindTheBest.jpg
888 ms
sc
10 ms
buttons-secure.css
24 ms
p.js
42 ms
ehow.png
822 ms
t.dhj
20 ms
t.dhj
5 ms
seattletimes.jpg
792 ms
t_.js
5 ms
generic
45 ms
fool.jpg
753 ms
tpid=CvQKBlmvGPMAAAARO20AAw%3D%3D
22 ms
consumersearch.jpg
844 ms
StockHouse.jpg
842 ms
ttd
124 ms
pixel
136 ms
generic
93 ms
facebook.png
772 ms
twitter.png
730 ms
ca-pub-1209652365671155.js
45 ms
zrt_lookup.html
58 ms
show_ads_impl.js
73 ms
HeaderWhiteChrome.jpg
716 ms
green_check.gif
718 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
nlsn
6 ms
cs
4 ms
collect
44 ms
cs
41 ms
ads
275 ms
osd.js
16 ms
get_counts
535 ms
facebook_counter.png
32 ms
bubble_arrow.png
31 ms
sharethis_counter.png
49 ms
twitter_counter.png
50 ms
collect
66 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
535 ms
50962
407 ms
gen_204
13 ms
ad
39 ms
dvbs_src.js
65 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
23 ms
osd_listener.js
26 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
28 ms
lidar.js
6 ms
d5qAyLYU.js
5 ms
pixel
26 ms
9im3l02I.html
9 ms
dvbs_src_internal34.js
9 ms
pixel
202 ms
pixel
230 ms
bst2tv3.html
256 ms
verify.js
341 ms
dv-match4.js
26 ms
T8Ys39_ecZUP0z5o0qwgiftCx6c5Z_CDv350QIo51NY.js
24 ms
4470
232 ms
sync
23 ms
bsevent.gif
269 ms
cookie_push.html
17 ms
transparent.png
8 ms
usermatchredir
24 ms
usermatchredir
9 ms
pixel
106 ms
index.html
26 ms
stcommon.0128627f929f0b889d3ed3a92817130e.js
22 ms
st.a5142d7623949e27681f588633849ba8.js
40 ms
brokerage-review.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
brokerage-review.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
brokerage-review.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brokerage-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brokerage-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brokerage-review.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brokerage Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: