Tools & Wizards About Us
buildingsecurity.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

buildingsecurity.com

Building Security Services: Top Security Company In NJ

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

buildingsecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Building Security content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about buildingsecurity.com

Building Security Services is a top security guard company in New Jersey and New York City servicing businesses of all sizes. NYC and NJ business owners can rest safe knowing our guards are watching o...

Visit buildingsecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Buildingsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

buildingsecurity.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

buildingsecurity.com

133 ms

www.buildingsecurity.com

66 ms

www.buildingsecurity.com

121 ms

gtm.js

185 ms

autoptimize_24da94104c0a90271057d597b995f6fc.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Buildingsecurity.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Js.hs-scripts.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 173.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

754.2 kB

After Optimization

581.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Buildingsecurity.com main page is 754.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 475.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 27.8 kB

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 475.3 kB
  • After minification 468.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Building Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 80.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 128.5 kB

  • Original 151.3 kB
  • After minification 151.0 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buildingsecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Building Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

buildingsecurity.com

buildingsecurity.com

133 ms

www.buildingsecurity.com

www.buildingsecurity.com

66 ms

www.buildingsecurity.com

www.buildingsecurity.com

121 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

185 ms

autoptimize_24da94104c0a90271057d597b995f6fc.css

autoptimize_24da94104c0a90271057d597b995f6fc.css

23 ms

autoptimize_a3c43e7e919f520089dd2299608c379b.css

autoptimize_a3c43e7e919f520089dd2299608c379b.css

164 ms

css

css

332 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

649 ms

2560058.js

2560058.js

1126 ms

autoptimize_397c813fea8d0023c91d49108d2447fc.js

autoptimize_397c813fea8d0023c91d49108d2447fc.js

298 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

846 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

673 ms

ico-search.svg

ico-search.svg

648 ms

bg-site-intro.jpg

bg-site-intro.jpg

650 ms

ico-ph.svg

ico-ph.svg

763 ms

ico-nav.svg

ico-nav.svg

750 ms

ico-arrow-down.svg

ico-arrow-down.svg

755 ms

ico-scroll.svg

ico-scroll.svg

758 ms

bg-shields.jpg

bg-shields.jpg

759 ms

ico-arrow-right.svg

ico-arrow-right.svg

755 ms

ico-gold-unarmed.svg

ico-gold-unarmed.svg

788 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

633 ms

hotjar-353981.js

hotjar-353981.js

720 ms

loader.js

loader.js

808 ms

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf

809 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf

875 ms

BCasqZ8XsOrx4mcOk6Mtaac2XA.ttf

BCasqZ8XsOrx4mcOk6Mtaac2XA.ttf

875 ms

site-logo.png

site-logo.png

151 ms

fb.js

fb.js

347 ms

2560058.js

2560058.js

714 ms

2560058.js

2560058.js

713 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

329 ms

js

js

146 ms

732417693843189

732417693843189

182 ms

modules.b98d976b35a426609eb5.js

modules.b98d976b35a426609eb5.js

740 ms

js

js

451 ms

box-469cf41adb11dc78be68c1ae7f9457a4.html

box-469cf41adb11dc78be68c1ae7f9457a4.html

1102 ms

call-tracking_2.js

call-tracking_2.js

652 ms

753 ms

ico-unarmed.svg

ico-unarmed.svg

561 ms

collect

collect

485 ms

ico-concierge.svg

ico-concierge.svg

451 ms

ico-fire-safety.svg

ico-fire-safety.svg

448 ms

ico-emergency-action.svg

ico-emergency-action.svg

450 ms

ico-access-control.svg

ico-access-control.svg

443 ms

ico-fire-life.svg

ico-fire-life.svg

445 ms

ico-intrusion-burglar.svg

ico-intrusion-burglar.svg

484 ms

ico-video-surveillance.svg

ico-video-surveillance.svg

482 ms

collect

collect

544 ms

__ptq.gif

__ptq.gif

264 ms

json

json

306 ms

ico-arrow-left.svg

ico-arrow-left.svg

129 ms

wcm

wcm

288 ms

json

json

251 ms

ico-exit.svg

ico-exit.svg

86 ms

img-slider-1.jpg

img-slider-1.jpg

159 ms

img-slider-2.jpg

img-slider-2.jpg

158 ms

js

js

136 ms

js

js

273 ms

2300914610000064

2300914610000064

120 ms

img-slider-3.jpg

img-slider-3.jpg

215 ms

94 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

58 ms

Accessibility Review

buildingsecurity.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

buildingsecurity.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

buildingsecurity.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buildingsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Buildingsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

buildingsecurity.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Building Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: