Tools & Wizards About Us
burkeandschultz.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

burkeandschultz.com

Burke Schultz Harman & Jenkinson - Personal Injury Attorneys

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

762 ms

Page Rendered

349 ms

burkeandschultz.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Burke And Schultz content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about burkeandschultz.com

The Martinsburg, West Virginia personal injury attorneys at Burke, Schultz, Harman & Jenkinson will fight for the compensation you need and deserve.

Visit burkeandschultz.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Burkeandschultz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

burkeandschultz.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

burkeandschultz.com

90 ms

www.burkeandschultz.com

262 ms

js

67 ms

style.min.css

36 ms

t.js

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Burkeandschultz.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Collector-25274.tvsquared.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (303 ms) belongs to the original domain Burkeandschultz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

101.6 kB

After Optimization

58.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Burkeandschultz.com main page is 101.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 58.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 47 B

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 43.5 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (48%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Burke And Schultz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

burkeandschultz.com

burkeandschultz.com

90 ms

www.burkeandschultz.com

www.burkeandschultz.com

262 ms

js

js

67 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

36 ms

t.js

t.js

82 ms

swap.js

swap.js

54 ms

tv2track.js

tv2track.js

105 ms

css

css

48 ms

ada-icon.webp

ada-icon.webp

38 ms

menu2015.webp

menu2015.webp

71 ms

xy.webp

xy.webp

103 ms

main.webp

main.webp

103 ms

1.webp

1.webp

174 ms

2.webp

2.webp

141 ms

3.webp

3.webp

175 ms

1.webp

1.webp

107 ms

2.webp

2.webp

136 ms

3.webp

3.webp

136 ms

4.webp

4.webp

141 ms

sprites-gen.webp

sprites-gen.webp

174 ms

mf-bg.webp

mf-bg.webp

303 ms

mf-main.webp

mf-main.webp

175 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

17 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

22 ms

dsk_slides.1.0.2.min.js

dsk_slides.1.0.2.min.js

41 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

91 ms

tv2track.php

tv2track.php

15 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrq_dSb_.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrq_dSb_.ttf

5 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

12 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

11 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

34 ms

Accessibility Review

burkeandschultz.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

burkeandschultz.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

burkeandschultz.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Burkeandschultz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Burkeandschultz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

burkeandschultz.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Burke And Schultz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: