Tools & Wizards About Us
byteboard.dev screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

byteboard.dev

Transform your technical interviews with project-based assessments - Byteboard

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

byteboard.dev screenshot

About Website

Visit byteboard.dev now to see the best up-to-date Byteboard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about byteboard.dev

Hire top performers with a technical interview that simulates what engineers actually do every day.

Visit byteboard.dev

Key Findings

We analyzed Byteboard.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

byteboard.dev performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

byteboard.dev

223 ms

gtm.js

57 ms

17c0b19a13fbb066.css

79 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

291 ms

webpack-69bfa6990bb9e155.js

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Byteboard.dev, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) belongs to the original domain Byteboard.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

689.8 kB

After Optimization

548.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Byteboard.dev main page is 689.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 591.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 76.4 kB
  • After minification 76.4 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 77.4 kB

  • Original 591.1 kB
  • After minification 513.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Byteboard needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 158 B

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 22.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 39 B

  • Original 218 B
  • After minification 217 B
  • After compression 179 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Byteboard.dev needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39 B or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (19%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byteboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

byteboard.dev

byteboard.dev

223 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

57 ms

17c0b19a13fbb066.css

17c0b19a13fbb066.css

79 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

291 ms

webpack-69bfa6990bb9e155.js

webpack-69bfa6990bb9e155.js

105 ms

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

109 ms

main-01df828e572375b9.js

main-01df828e572375b9.js

111 ms

_app-b5538a224e95cc75.js

_app-b5538a224e95cc75.js

283 ms

index-6999599f005c7893.js

index-6999599f005c7893.js

287 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

285 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

282 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

283 ms

homepage.svg

homepage.svg

326 ms

arcadia-logo.png

arcadia-logo.png

325 ms

lyft-logo-color.png

lyft-logo-color.png

339 ms

imperfect-foods-logo.png

imperfect-foods-logo.png

337 ms

betterment-logo.png

betterment-logo.png

337 ms

playvs-logo.png

playvs-logo.png

339 ms

ezoic-logo.png

ezoic-logo.png

345 ms

lyft-logo.png

lyft-logo.png

346 ms

traditional-skills.png

traditional-skills.png

339 ms

no-quality-control.png

no-quality-control.png

340 ms

no-time-calendar.png

no-time-calendar.png

343 ms

byteboard-skills.png

byteboard-skills.png

344 ms

quality-control.png

quality-control.png

345 ms

time-calendar.png

time-calendar.png

345 ms

gen-swe.png

gen-swe.png

346 ms

frontend-eng.png

frontend-eng.png

346 ms

mobile-eng.png

mobile-eng.png

347 ms

data-eng.png

data-eng.png

379 ms

sre.png

sre.png

353 ms

computer-woman.png

computer-woman.png

395 ms

circle-check.png

circle-check.png

382 ms

inclusive-hiring.png

inclusive-hiring.png

498 ms

bb-logo-inverted.png

bb-logo-inverted.png

429 ms

hero-bg@2x.png

hero-bg@2x.png

431 ms

shapes3.png

shapes3.png

445 ms

shapes2.png

shapes2.png

440 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

shapes4.png

shapes4.png

427 ms

betterment-case-study.png

betterment-case-study.png

424 ms

ezoic-case-study.png

ezoic-case-study.png

445 ms

lyft-case-study.png

lyft-case-study.png

450 ms

collect

collect

102 ms

shapes5.png

shapes5.png

272 ms

shapes6.png

shapes6.png

271 ms

shapes7.png

shapes7.png

276 ms

forbes.png

forbes.png

273 ms

tech-crunch.png

tech-crunch.png

286 ms

keyword.png

keyword.png

230 ms

try-it-out-guy.png

try-it-out-guy.png

304 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

63 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

147 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrzaJ5llpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrzaJ5llpy8.woff

61 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

73 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

69 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

75 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

71 ms

collect

collect

131 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

59 ms

Accessibility Review

byteboard.dev accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

byteboard.dev best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

byteboard.dev SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Byteboard.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Byteboard.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

byteboard.dev

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Byteboard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: