1.4 sec in total
110 ms
1.3 sec
64 ms
Welcome to bytebot.net homepage info - get ready to check Bytebot best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bytebot.net
Visit bytebot.netWe analyzed Bytebot.net page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
bytebot.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value23,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.13
82/100
15%
Value33.7 s
0/100
10%
110 ms
5 ms
90 ms
155 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Bytebot.net, 18% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (689 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 11.1 kB (2%)
492.7 kB
481.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Bytebot.net main page is 492.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 404.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 311 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bytebot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 618 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 142 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytebot.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (46%)
26
14
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bytebot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bytebot.net
110 ms
base.css
5 ms
adsbygoogle.js
90 ms
show_ads.js
155 ms
publisher-en.js
7 ms
me
14 ms
badge_code_v2.gne
6 ms
139 ms
ga.js
15 ms
me.jpg
9 ms
badge_code_v2.gne
76 ms
37 ms
34 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
show_ads_impl.js
249 ms
widgets.js
42 ms
linkroll.js
310 ms
537 ms
zrt_lookup.html
42 ms
ads
689 ms
ads
363 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
262 ms
16465890640144005737
24 ms
abg_lite.js
25 ms
s
15 ms
window_focus.js
21 ms
qs_click_protection.js
28 ms
ufs_web_display.js
16 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
140 ms
icon.png
13 ms
activeview
63 ms
settings
155 ms
GhmJCpBREX7wgGMT0ZiWZLwlRNdtIOd5PV2NPLMoOVM.js
5 ms
bytebot.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
bytebot.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bytebot.net SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytebot.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bytebot.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
bytebot.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bytebot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: