Tools & Wizards About Us
bytegate.ir screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bytegate.ir

بایت گیت

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

651 ms

bytegate.ir screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bytegate content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bytegate.ir

آموزش مباحث اینترنتی و کامپیوتری مانند شبکه، نرم افزار، سخت افزار، امنیت، و ... به صورت تصویری و به زبان ساده

Visit bytegate.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Bytegate.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bytegate.ir performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bytegate.ir

2658 ms

styles.css

254 ms

styles-rtl.css

255 ms

gglcptch.css

251 ms

symple_shortcodes_styles.css

255 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Bytegate.ir, 3% (2 requests) were made to Webshomar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bytegate.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 451.6 kB (47%)

Content Size

955.5 kB

After Optimization

503.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bytegate.ir main page is 955.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 370.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 119.0 kB

  • Original 134.9 kB
  • After minification 121.7 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 370.9 kB
  • After minification 355.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bytegate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 189.1 kB

  • Original 293.1 kB
  • After minification 285.0 kB
  • After compression 104.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.2 kB

  • Original 156.6 kB
  • After minification 140.5 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytegate.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (45%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bytegate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bytegate.ir

bytegate.ir

2658 ms

styles.css

styles.css

254 ms

styles-rtl.css

styles-rtl.css

255 ms

gglcptch.css

gglcptch.css

251 ms

symple_shortcodes_styles.css

symple_shortcodes_styles.css

255 ms

font-awesome.min.css.css

font-awesome.min.css.css

248 ms

css

css

89 ms

style.css

style.css

375 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

384 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

389 ms

wp-about-author.css

wp-about-author.css

403 ms

rtl.css

rtl.css

407 ms

tabligh6c.css

tabligh6c.css

417 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

696 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

626 ms

colormag-custom.js

colormag-custom.js

625 ms

387 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

519 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

519 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

522 ms

colormag-slider-setting.js

colormag-slider-setting.js

523 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

523 ms

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

524 ms

ticker-setting.js

ticker-setting.js

524 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

550 ms

sticky-setting.js

sticky-setting.js

606 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

604 ms

image-popup-setting.js

image-popup-setting.js

650 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

642 ms

fitvids-setting.js

fitvids-setting.js

645 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

715 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

402 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

194 ms

logo.aspx

logo.aspx

796 ms

telegram_icon.png

telegram_icon.png

743 ms

ByteGate_Logo.png

ByteGate_Logo.png

744 ms

Bazyabi.com_728X90.gif

Bazyabi.com_728X90.gif

922 ms

NTFS-File-System-390x205.png

NTFS-File-System-390x205.png

749 ms

iso-file-format-130x90.png

iso-file-format-130x90.png

746 ms

What-is-Protocol-130x90.png

What-is-Protocol-130x90.png

746 ms

Mouse-130x90.png

Mouse-130x90.png

746 ms

mics-130x90.png

mics-130x90.png

747 ms

720x90_hdd_2t.gif

720x90_hdd_2t.gif

921 ms

vpn_trans-390x205.png

vpn_trans-390x205.png

813 ms

Keylogger-130x90.png

Keylogger-130x90.png

801 ms

%D9%87%DA%A9-%D8%AA%D9%84%DA%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85-130x90.png

%D9%87%DA%A9-%D8%AA%D9%84%DA%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85-130x90.png

780 ms

Change-WiFi-Password-t-130x90.png

Change-WiFi-Password-t-130x90.png

762 ms

Phishing-Attacks-130x90.jpg

Phishing-Attacks-130x90.jpg

1842 ms

OSI-Model-H-390x205.png

OSI-Model-H-390x205.png

2350 ms

%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AE%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%85-130x90.png

%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AE%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%85-130x90.png

939 ms

Network-Latency-Ping-130x90.jpg

Network-Latency-Ping-130x90.jpg

950 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

739 ms

127.0.0.1-localhost-IP-130x90.jpg

127.0.0.1-localhost-IP-130x90.jpg

1003 ms

Mouse-390x205.png

Mouse-390x205.png

1293 ms

DVD-130x90.jpg

DVD-130x90.jpg

1489 ms

Analog-and-Digital-130x90.png

Analog-and-Digital-130x90.png

900 ms

iso-file-format-390x205.png

iso-file-format-390x205.png

1202 ms

Codec-130x90.png

Codec-130x90.png

1011 ms

JSON-130x90.png

JSON-130x90.png

1108 ms

con-folder-title-130x90.jpg

con-folder-title-130x90.jpg

1259 ms

rar-file-format-130x90.jpg

rar-file-format-130x90.jpg

1355 ms

BBCNassim.woff

BBCNassim.woff

1648 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

collect

collect

171 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1621 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1493 ms

300x250_hdd_lf.gif

300x250_hdd_lf.gif

3165 ms

ByteGate_120x240_placeholder.png

ByteGate_120x240_placeholder.png

2456 ms

1.png

1.png

560 ms

Accessibility Review

bytegate.ir accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bytegate.ir best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

bytegate.ir SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytegate.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bytegate.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bytegate.ir

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bytegate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: