Tools & Wizards About Us
comparison.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    69% of websites

comparison.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

170 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

537 ms

comparison.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparison.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Comparison Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about comparison.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit comparison.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparison.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparison.bookmarking.site performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,260 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparison.bookmarking.site

170 ms

www.comparison.bookmarking.site

748 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

176 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

167 ms

font-awesome.min.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Comparison.bookmarking.site, 58% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (748 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparison.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 294.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

591.0 kB

After Optimization

296.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparison.bookmarking.site main page is 591.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 307.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 93.0 kB

  • Original 107.5 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 120.0 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Comparison Bookmarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 161.8 kB

  • Original 307.9 kB
  • After minification 307.7 kB
  • After compression 146.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.8 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 55.5 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparison.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (24%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

60

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparison Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparison.bookmarking.site

comparison.bookmarking.site

170 ms

www.comparison.bookmarking.site

www.comparison.bookmarking.site

748 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

176 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

167 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

169 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

165 ms

style.css

style.css

171 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

171 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

74 ms

custom.js

custom.js

247 ms

js

js

89 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

67 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

40 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

11 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

458 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

392 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

175 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

175 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

84 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

185 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

170 ms

eOTdhSA.png

eOTdhSA.png

226 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

216 ms

FImGWJF.png

FImGWJF.png

430 ms

qBImyJx.png

qBImyJx.png

537 ms

WIq7XNW.png

WIq7XNW.png

477 ms

9I0Cxud.png

9I0Cxud.png

475 ms

KgB9f7s.png

KgB9f7s.png

476 ms

tHFUMaX.png

tHFUMaX.png

485 ms

026gTLK.png

026gTLK.png

475 ms

7gHvjqQ.png

7gHvjqQ.png

536 ms

QAhkrAJ.png

QAhkrAJ.png

532 ms

QxmjiTo.png

QxmjiTo.png

533 ms

MZyENbB.png

MZyENbB.png

533 ms

CwB5HaK.png

CwB5HaK.png

533 ms

WBracSz.png

WBracSz.png

536 ms

ePk2DI5.png

ePk2DI5.png

572 ms

LEedGnC.png

LEedGnC.png

571 ms

m3BZdwk.png

m3BZdwk.png

572 ms

1SshkMB.png

1SshkMB.png

571 ms

X9nBNNZ.png

X9nBNNZ.png

571 ms

DVOGAWJ.png

DVOGAWJ.png

570 ms

6lDAG94.png

6lDAG94.png

586 ms

bd9GCl7.png

bd9GCl7.png

588 ms

3oqs8wJ.png

3oqs8wJ.png

587 ms

ZPSUvlu.png

ZPSUvlu.png

587 ms

lVfarbS.png

lVfarbS.png

585 ms

0ET5lZ8.png

0ET5lZ8.png

586 ms

WU7vORc.png

WU7vORc.png

603 ms

dM0Czwf.png

dM0Czwf.png

617 ms

IweYOYV.png

IweYOYV.png

618 ms

WQXTLWV.png

WQXTLWV.png

603 ms

xk457bs.png

xk457bs.png

595 ms

IrmFo6o.png

IrmFo6o.png

596 ms

FI4KHEj.png

FI4KHEj.png

615 ms

9AIgGam.png

9AIgGam.png

614 ms

ePvsv4J.png

ePvsv4J.png

615 ms

1j9eiA9.png

1j9eiA9.png

629 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

287 ms

js

js

284 ms

collect

collect

277 ms

iUXS6vb.png

iUXS6vb.png

302 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

296 ms

a38d413a-28fb-49a3-aeaf-77d189cf1e3c

a38d413a-28fb-49a3-aeaf-77d189cf1e3c

304 ms

0mdRVUS.png

0mdRVUS.png

212 ms

ERrt1rI.png

ERrt1rI.png

166 ms

YVrquv7.png

YVrquv7.png

166 ms

46Gk8Og.png

46Gk8Og.png

163 ms

4KEXENL.png

4KEXENL.png

158 ms

collect

collect

192 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

b9iCAFh.png

b9iCAFh.png

118 ms

P7ArLzv.png

P7ArLzv.png

113 ms

AMxhNpd.png

AMxhNpd.png

112 ms

BbOpOE7.png

BbOpOE7.png

109 ms

xI3hQb7.png

xI3hQb7.png

109 ms

79Zwewy.png

79Zwewy.png

144 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

collect

collect

121 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

Accessibility Review

comparison.bookmarking.site accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

comparison.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

comparison.bookmarking.site SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparison.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparison.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparison.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparison Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: