Tools & Wizards About Us
concern.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    69% of websites

concern.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

concern.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Concern Bookmarking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about concern.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit concern.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Concern.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

concern.bookmarking.site performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

concern.bookmarking.site

82 ms

www.concern.bookmarking.site

444 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

79 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

84 ms

font-awesome.min.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Concern.bookmarking.site, 59% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) relates to the external source I.imgur.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 273.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

569.3 kB

After Optimization

296.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Concern.bookmarking.site main page is 569.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 302.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 92.8 kB

  • Original 107.3 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 120.0 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Concern Bookmarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 156.3 kB

  • Original 302.4 kB
  • After minification 302.4 kB
  • After compression 146.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Concern.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (25%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

58

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Concern Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

concern.bookmarking.site

concern.bookmarking.site

82 ms

www.concern.bookmarking.site

www.concern.bookmarking.site

444 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

79 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

84 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

86 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

88 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

87 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

custom.js

custom.js

116 ms

js

js

60 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

44 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

12 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

23 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

89 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

92 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

93 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

93 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

39 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

297 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

298 ms

eOTdhSA.png

eOTdhSA.png

402 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

248 ms

FImGWJF.png

FImGWJF.png

255 ms

qBImyJx.png

qBImyJx.png

409 ms

WIq7XNW.png

WIq7XNW.png

389 ms

9I0Cxud.png

9I0Cxud.png

390 ms

KgB9f7s.png

KgB9f7s.png

395 ms

tHFUMaX.png

tHFUMaX.png

394 ms

026gTLK.png

026gTLK.png

407 ms

7gHvjqQ.png

7gHvjqQ.png

417 ms

QAhkrAJ.png

QAhkrAJ.png

417 ms

QxmjiTo.png

QxmjiTo.png

650 ms

MZyENbB.png

MZyENbB.png

649 ms

CwB5HaK.png

CwB5HaK.png

647 ms

WBracSz.png

WBracSz.png

648 ms

ePk2DI5.png

ePk2DI5.png

647 ms

LEedGnC.png

LEedGnC.png

644 ms

m3BZdwk.png

m3BZdwk.png

678 ms

1SshkMB.png

1SshkMB.png

679 ms

X9nBNNZ.png

X9nBNNZ.png

676 ms

DVOGAWJ.png

DVOGAWJ.png

679 ms

6lDAG94.png

6lDAG94.png

697 ms

bd9GCl7.png

bd9GCl7.png

739 ms

3oqs8wJ.png

3oqs8wJ.png

694 ms

ZPSUvlu.png

ZPSUvlu.png

697 ms

lVfarbS.png

lVfarbS.png

697 ms

0ET5lZ8.png

0ET5lZ8.png

694 ms

WU7vORc.png

WU7vORc.png

714 ms

dM0Czwf.png

dM0Czwf.png

741 ms

IweYOYV.png

IweYOYV.png

712 ms

WQXTLWV.png

WQXTLWV.png

742 ms

xk457bs.png

xk457bs.png

714 ms

IrmFo6o.png

IrmFo6o.png

730 ms

FI4KHEj.png

FI4KHEj.png

728 ms

9AIgGam.png

9AIgGam.png

729 ms

ePvsv4J.png

ePvsv4J.png

732 ms

1j9eiA9.png

1j9eiA9.png

730 ms

a38d413a-28fb-49a3-aeaf-77d189cf1e3c

a38d413a-28fb-49a3-aeaf-77d189cf1e3c

740 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

355 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

107 ms

js

js

217 ms

collect

collect

538 ms

iUXS6vb.png

iUXS6vb.png

487 ms

0mdRVUS.png

0mdRVUS.png

356 ms

ERrt1rI.png

ERrt1rI.png

358 ms

YVrquv7.png

YVrquv7.png

352 ms

46Gk8Og.png

46Gk8Og.png

355 ms

4KEXENL.png

4KEXENL.png

380 ms

b9iCAFh.png

b9iCAFh.png

381 ms

P7ArLzv.png

P7ArLzv.png

381 ms

AMxhNpd.png

AMxhNpd.png

374 ms

collect

collect

421 ms

collect

collect

278 ms

collect

collect

279 ms

collect

collect

281 ms

BbOpOE7.png

BbOpOE7.png

277 ms

xI3hQb7.png

xI3hQb7.png

277 ms

79Zwewy.png

79Zwewy.png

278 ms

collect

collect

110 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

92 ms

Accessibility Review

concern.bookmarking.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

concern.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

concern.bookmarking.site SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Concern.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Concern.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

concern.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Concern Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: