11.4 sec in total
137 ms
10.8 sec
446 ms
Welcome to dating-sites.bestreviews.net homepage info - get ready to check Dating Sites Best Reviews best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about dating-sites.bestreviews.net
Reviews of the best dating sites and apps by experts and other daters. Compare dating websites, get free accounts and enjoy special offers.
Visit dating-sites.bestreviews.netWe analyzed Dating-sites.bestreviews.net page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
dating-sites.bestreviews.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
137 ms
7526 ms
156 ms
1205 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Dating-sites.bestreviews.net, 12% (10 requests) were made to Cdn2.bestreviews.net and 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Dating-sites.bestreviews.net.
Page size can be reduced by 363.1 kB (58%)
623.2 kB
260.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Dating-sites.bestreviews.net main page is 623.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 292.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dating Sites Best Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 171.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dating-sites.bestreviews.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (68%)
76
24
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dating Sites Best Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dating-sites.bestreviews.net
137 ms
dating-sites.bestreviews.net
7526 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
156 ms
myrp-hotlink-css.php
1205 ms
jquery.rating.css
96 ms
global.css
104 ms
style.css
107 ms
colorbox.css
103 ms
css
126 ms
jquery.js
109 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
101 ms
myrp-hotlink-js.php
1279 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
101 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
110 ms
jtip.js
108 ms
cookie.js
109 ms
detectmobilebrowser.js
105 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
99 ms
tw-sack.min.js
108 ms
mailchimp-signupform-sidebar.css
246 ms
conversion.js
113 ms
box-shortcodes.css
102 ms
content-shortcodes.css
103 ms
wp-embed.min.js
104 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
collect
70 ms
collect
245 ms
cool-stars.png
60 ms
icon-search.png
55 ms
icon-li.png
49 ms
icon-li-footer.png
49 ms
logo.png
242 ms
thai-love-links-logo.png
241 ms
sugardaddie-logo.png
241 ms
perfect-match-logo.png
242 ms
date-com-logo.png
469 ms
seeking-arrangement-logo.png
416 ms
jdate-logo.png
495 ms
senior-friendfinder-logo.png
495 ms
badoo-logo.png
464 ms
catholic-match-logo.png
460 ms
ourtime-logo.png
709 ms
all.js
610 ms
plusone.js
261 ms
widgets.js
289 ms
pinit.js
213 ms
225 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
229 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
271 ms
pinit_main.js
35 ms
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
46 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
62 ms
badge
154 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
42 ms
postmessageRelay
79 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
64 ms
api.js
58 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
165 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
200 ms
rs=AGLTcCPuAgO4ibCoNY7Z7uvsgRNS_6x51Q
26 ms
rs=AGLTcCNVayw58ATXmq5na_KkaQDUov7ewA
49 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
99 ms
photo.jpg
165 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
98 ms
d-QWLnp4didxos_6urzFtg.woff
146 ms
vxNK-E6B13CyehuDCmvQvw.woff
138 ms
jot
169 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
40 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
18 ms
58 ms
xd_arbiter.php
430 ms
like_box.php
58 ms
FbUd6dZS1Af.css
285 ms
dGJLq38YL-C.css
355 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
489 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
619 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
488 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
509 ms
1925306_626185394128937_1134492059_n.png
286 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
79 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
79 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
135 ms
dating-sites.bestreviews.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dating-sites.bestreviews.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dating-sites.bestreviews.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dating-sites.bestreviews.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dating-sites.bestreviews.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dating-sites.bestreviews.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dating Sites Best Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: