2.9 sec in total
93 ms
2.3 sec
501 ms
Visit juliestuart.batchbook.com now to see the best up-to-date Juliestuart Batchbook content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about juliestuart.batchbook.com
Visit juliestuart.batchbook.comWe analyzed Juliestuart.batchbook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
juliestuart.batchbook.com performance score
93 ms
234 ms
854 ms
267 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Juliestuart.batchbook.com, 66% (42 requests) were made to 298ku01ot9bw3oxy722o82sx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Batchbook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (854 ms) relates to the external source Batchbook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 709.1 kB (51%)
1.4 MB
683.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Juliestuart.batchbook.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 560.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Juliestuart Batchbook needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 160.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.9 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 386.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juliestuart.batchbook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 386.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)
51
15
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Juliestuart Batchbook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
juliestuart.batchbook.com
93 ms
juliestuart.batchbook.com
234 ms
854 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
267 ms
298ku01ot9bw3oxy722o82sx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com
18 ms
style.css
26 ms
bb-brand.css
17 ms
rgs.css
19 ms
font-awesome.min.css
19 ms
style.css
22 ms
responsive.css
47 ms
js_composer.css
39 ms
jquery.js
58 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
scrollTo.js
43 ms
jquery.form.min.js
44 ms
mailchimp.js
49 ms
bb2-login.js
79 ms
modernizr.js
84 ms
superfish.js
182 ms
respond.js
183 ms
sticky.js
183 ms
prettyPhoto.js
186 ms
isotope.min.js
182 ms
init.js
242 ms
js_composer_front.js
183 ms
count.js
183 ms
analytics.js
185 ms
footer-skyline-4.png
94 ms
bb-sticker-no-shadow.png
84 ms
bb-stickerX2-no-shadow.png
70 ms
bb-sticker.png
72 ms
bb-stickerX2.png
79 ms
1888-cell-icon.png
71 ms
blue-ombre.png
79 ms
essential3.png
76 ms
advanced31.png
71 ms
managed32.png
80 ms
ce-team-opt.jpg
72 ms
big-quote5.png
70 ms
mguard-small.png
72 ms
big-quote24.png
73 ms
i.js
67 ms
887e2c3ce8fd58c58706235fbc3bc466bea605e7.1.js
69 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
38 ms
bariol_bold-webfont-webfont.woff
412 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
41 ms
bariol_regular-webfont.woff
413 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
42 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
42 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
42 ms
opensans-italic-webfont.woff
413 ms
collect
388 ms
b9b6aa0d-801f-4c8c-b57e-4e861ba9139e.js
366 ms
collect
278 ms
3999.js
205 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
204 ms
count.js
234 ms
blank.gif
58 ms
ga-audiences
63 ms
s
58 ms
u
63 ms
help_lightblue_right_en.png
60 ms
roundtrip.js
16 ms
juliestuart.batchbook.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juliestuart.batchbook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juliestuart.batchbook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
juliestuart.batchbook.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Juliestuart Batchbook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: