Tools & Wizards About Us
luggage.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

luggage.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

369 ms

luggage.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to luggage.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Luggage Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about luggage.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit luggage.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Luggage.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luggage.bookmarking.site performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luggage.bookmarking.site

164 ms

www.luggage.bookmarking.site

347 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

134 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

130 ms

font-awesome.min.css

125 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Luggage.bookmarking.site, 65% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (363 ms) relates to the external source Authapi.ipt.pw.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

288.2 kB

After Optimization

174.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luggage.bookmarking.site main page is 288.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 132.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 113.9 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luggage Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 132.0 kB
  • After minification 132.0 kB
  • After compression 125.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luggage.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (93%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luggage Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luggage.bookmarking.site

luggage.bookmarking.site

164 ms

www.luggage.bookmarking.site

www.luggage.bookmarking.site

347 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

134 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

130 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

125 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

131 ms

style.css

style.css

131 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

132 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

custom.js

custom.js

187 ms

js

js

78 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

47 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

9 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

11 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

136 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

273 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

272 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

272 ms

ad.js

ad.js

363 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

64 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

117 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

117 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

163 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

199 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

removed.png

removed.png

177 ms

removed.png

removed.png

176 ms

removed.png

removed.png

174 ms

removed.png

removed.png

176 ms

removed.png

removed.png

176 ms

removed.png

removed.png

177 ms

removed.png

removed.png

165 ms

removed.png

removed.png

164 ms

removed.png

removed.png

167 ms

removed.png

removed.png

164 ms

removed.png

removed.png

163 ms

removed.png

removed.png

149 ms

removed.png

removed.png

151 ms

removed.png

removed.png

136 ms

removed.png

removed.png

129 ms

removed.png

removed.png

133 ms

removed.png

removed.png

122 ms

removed.png

removed.png

122 ms

removed.png

removed.png

119 ms

removed.png

removed.png

116 ms

removed.png

removed.png

117 ms

removed.png

removed.png

102 ms

removed.png

removed.png

102 ms

removed.png

removed.png

103 ms

removed.png

removed.png

108 ms

removed.png

removed.png

103 ms

removed.png

removed.png

100 ms

removed.png

removed.png

82 ms

removed.png

removed.png

83 ms

removed.png

removed.png

62 ms

removed.png

removed.png

46 ms

removed.png

removed.png

45 ms

removed.png

removed.png

79 ms

removed.png

removed.png

73 ms

removed.png

removed.png

64 ms

removed.png

removed.png

63 ms

removed.png

removed.png

63 ms

removed.png

removed.png

65 ms

removed.png

removed.png

70 ms

removed.png

removed.png

64 ms

removed.png

removed.png

43 ms

removed.png

removed.png

28 ms

removed.png

removed.png

19 ms

removed.png

removed.png

11 ms

removed.png

removed.png

9 ms

removed.png

removed.png

7 ms

removed.png

removed.png

2 ms

removed.png

removed.png

3 ms

Accessibility Review

luggage.bookmarking.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

luggage.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

luggage.bookmarking.site SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luggage.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luggage.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luggage.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luggage Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: