Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

post.bark.co

BARK Post: Dog News, Guides, Reviews, & Cool Stuff from BARK

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

post.bark.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Post BARK content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about post.bark.co

Do you have questions about caring for your dog? Explore the latest news & information related to dogs & puppies with BARK Post!

Visit post.bark.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Post.bark.co page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

post.bark.co performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,130 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

post.bark.co

253 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

36 ms

style.min.css

32 ms

fonts.css

39 ms

sumoselect.min.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Post.bark.co, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) belongs to the original domain Post.bark.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.3 MB (81%)

Content Size

10.3 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Post.bark.co main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 250.4 kB

  • Original 278.9 kB
  • After minification 187.9 kB
  • After compression 28.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 91.0 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 250.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 8.0 MB

  • Original 8.8 MB
  • After minification 767.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Post BARK needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.0 MB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 573.3 kB
  • After minification 573.3 kB
  • After compression 559.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 643.3 kB
  • After minification 643.1 kB
  • After compression 608.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Post.bark.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (81%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Post BARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

post.bark.co accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

post.bark.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

post.bark.co SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Post.bark.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Post.bark.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Post BARK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: