2.8 sec in total
138 ms
2.1 sec
593 ms
Visit scheme.bookmarking.site now to see the best up-to-date Scheme Bookmarking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scheme.bookmarking.site
iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.
Visit scheme.bookmarking.siteWe analyzed Scheme.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
scheme.bookmarking.site performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
Value36,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value46.6 s
0/100
10%
138 ms
493 ms
175 ms
116 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Scheme.bookmarking.site, 59% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) relates to the external source I.imgur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 268.6 kB (48%)
562.1 kB
293.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Scheme.bookmarking.site main page is 562.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 302.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scheme Bookmarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 156.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.3 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scheme.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (24%)
78
59
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scheme Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scheme.bookmarking.site
138 ms
www.scheme.bookmarking.site
493 ms
bootstrap.no-icons.min.css
175 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
116 ms
font-awesome.min.css
121 ms
jquery.pnotify.css
125 ms
style.css
130 ms
modernizr.js
125 ms
jquery.min.js
63 ms
custom.js
207 ms
js
102 ms
snippet.js
74 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
37 ms
jquery-ui.css
9 ms
registration_verify.js
153 ms
bootstrap.min.js
155 ms
bootstrap-fileupload.js
155 ms
jquery.pnotify.min.js
155 ms
my-style.css
106 ms
analytics.js
141 ms
gtm.js
141 ms
eOTdhSA.png
527 ms
Avatar_32.png
495 ms
FImGWJF.png
496 ms
qBImyJx.png
527 ms
WIq7XNW.png
527 ms
9I0Cxud.png
527 ms
KgB9f7s.png
528 ms
tHFUMaX.png
524 ms
026gTLK.png
525 ms
7gHvjqQ.png
571 ms
QAhkrAJ.png
567 ms
QxmjiTo.png
568 ms
MZyENbB.png
569 ms
CwB5HaK.png
568 ms
WBracSz.png
567 ms
ePk2DI5.png
712 ms
LEedGnC.png
713 ms
m3BZdwk.png
713 ms
1SshkMB.png
711 ms
X9nBNNZ.png
712 ms
DVOGAWJ.png
709 ms
6lDAG94.png
865 ms
bd9GCl7.png
897 ms
3oqs8wJ.png
897 ms
ZPSUvlu.png
895 ms
lVfarbS.png
894 ms
0ET5lZ8.png
897 ms
WU7vORc.png
935 ms
dM0Czwf.png
929 ms
IweYOYV.png
929 ms
WQXTLWV.png
899 ms
xk457bs.png
911 ms
IrmFo6o.png
928 ms
FI4KHEj.png
935 ms
9AIgGam.png
936 ms
ePvsv4J.png
940 ms
1j9eiA9.png
936 ms
gtm.js
392 ms
js
302 ms
collect
560 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
531 ms
a38d413a-28fb-49a3-aeaf-77d189cf1e3c
650 ms
iUXS6vb.png
456 ms
0mdRVUS.png
425 ms
ERrt1rI.png
423 ms
YVrquv7.png
426 ms
46Gk8Og.png
428 ms
4KEXENL.png
431 ms
b9iCAFh.png
426 ms
P7ArLzv.png
397 ms
AMxhNpd.png
390 ms
BbOpOE7.png
391 ms
xI3hQb7.png
391 ms
79Zwewy.png
392 ms
collect
435 ms
collect
192 ms
collect
227 ms
collect
226 ms
collect
217 ms
analytics.js
213 ms
collect
181 ms
scheme.bookmarking.site accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
scheme.bookmarking.site best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
scheme.bookmarking.site SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scheme.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scheme.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scheme.bookmarking.site
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scheme Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: