2.3 sec in total
274 ms
1.8 sec
224 ms
Visit security.bookmarking.site now to see the best up-to-date Security Bookmarking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about security.bookmarking.site
iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.
Visit security.bookmarking.siteWe analyzed Security.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
security.bookmarking.site performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value38.4 s
0/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
274 ms
881 ms
130 ms
138 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Security.bookmarking.site, 61% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) belongs to the original domain Security.bookmarking.site.
Page size can be reduced by 142.6 kB (45%)
317.1 kB
174.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Security.bookmarking.site main page is 317.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 167.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Security Bookmarking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Security.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (91%)
75
7
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
security.bookmarking.site
274 ms
www.security.bookmarking.site
881 ms
bootstrap.no-icons.min.css
130 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
138 ms
font-awesome.min.css
127 ms
jquery.pnotify.css
126 ms
style.css
123 ms
modernizr.js
138 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
custom.js
185 ms
js
88 ms
snippet.js
42 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
11 ms
jquery-ui.css
16 ms
registration_verify.js
130 ms
bootstrap.min.js
132 ms
bootstrap-fileupload.js
286 ms
jquery.pnotify.min.js
287 ms
my-style.css
65 ms
analytics.js
133 ms
gtm.js
183 ms
Avatar_32.png
161 ms
js
130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
242 ms
collect
61 ms
gtm.js
87 ms
removed.png
156 ms
removed.png
143 ms
removed.png
143 ms
removed.png
143 ms
removed.png
139 ms
collect
50 ms
removed.png
132 ms
removed.png
149 ms
removed.png
123 ms
removed.png
123 ms
removed.png
114 ms
removed.png
114 ms
removed.png
91 ms
removed.png
91 ms
removed.png
93 ms
removed.png
90 ms
removed.png
91 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
60 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
41 ms
removed.png
62 ms
removed.png
60 ms
removed.png
70 ms
removed.png
71 ms
removed.png
71 ms
removed.png
70 ms
removed.png
73 ms
removed.png
70 ms
removed.png
71 ms
removed.png
73 ms
removed.png
41 ms
removed.png
40 ms
removed.png
41 ms
removed.png
40 ms
removed.png
39 ms
removed.png
34 ms
removed.png
34 ms
removed.png
52 ms
removed.png
48 ms
removed.png
41 ms
removed.png
41 ms
removed.png
41 ms
removed.png
19 ms
removed.png
20 ms
removed.png
20 ms
removed.png
19 ms
removed.png
19 ms
removed.png
15 ms
removed.png
14 ms
removed.png
16 ms
removed.png
14 ms
removed.png
2 ms
security.bookmarking.site accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
security.bookmarking.site best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
security.bookmarking.site SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Security.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Security.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
security.bookmarking.site
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Security Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: