5.9 sec in total
412 ms
5.2 sec
319 ms
Welcome to callcenter.ae homepage info - get ready to check Call Center best content right away, or after learning these important things about callcenter.ae
Call center in Dubai, UAE - DVCOM Technology provides the best and most powerful Call Center Service offering 24/7 call center services.
Visit callcenter.aeWe analyzed Callcenter.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
callcenter.ae performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value18.9 s
0/100
10%
Value3,370 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value22.4 s
1/100
10%
412 ms
124 ms
177 ms
240 ms
358 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Callcenter.ae, 18% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (797 ms) relates to the external source Xcally.datavoiz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 306.4 kB (27%)
1.1 MB
813.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Callcenter.ae main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 702.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Call Center images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 129.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callcenter.ae needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.1 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (80%)
69
14
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Call Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.callcenter.ae
412 ms
prettyPhoto.css
124 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
177 ms
style.min.css
240 ms
styles.css
358 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
178 ms
css2
35 ms
general.css
180 ms
custom-1.css
181 ms
style.css
237 ms
base.css
305 ms
layout.css
311 ms
shortcodes.css
260 ms
animations.min.css
300 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
302 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
324 ms
responsive.css
374 ms
css
34 ms
css
34 ms
css
35 ms
all.css
152 ms
v4-shims.css
192 ms
rpt_style.min.css
363 ms
jquery.min.js
430 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
372 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
390 ms
video-lightbox.js
416 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
425 ms
rpt.min.js
443 ms
js
77 ms
snippet
797 ms
css
13 ms
font-awesome.css
402 ms
css
14 ms
rs6.css
455 ms
index.js
456 ms
index.js
456 ms
rbtools.min.js
558 ms
rs6.min.js
623 ms
main.js
457 ms
core.min.js
493 ms
mouse.min.js
494 ms
sortable.min.js
551 ms
tabs.min.js
557 ms
accordion.min.js
557 ms
plugins.js
672 ms
api.js
75 ms
menu.js
568 ms
animations.min.js
558 ms
jplayer.min.js
509 ms
scripts.js
516 ms
comment-reply.min.js
510 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
554 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
509 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
508 ms
index.js
486 ms
complianz.min.js
458 ms
dummy.png
336 ms
QueueMetrics_logo.png
342 ms
Wombat_logo.png
351 ms
QueueMetrics-Live_logo.png
358 ms
QueueWiz_logo.png
359 ms
logo-corp-red.png
367 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
80 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
96 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
92 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
106 ms
mfn-icons.woff
378 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
108 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
107 ms
stripes_10_w.png
332 ms
home_profile_bg_section1.jpg
332 ms
bg-6.jpg
333 ms
box_shadow_button.png
332 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
43 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
44 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
42 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
85 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
113 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
49 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
50 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
49 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
45 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
42 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
44 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
44 ms
recaptcha__en.js
75 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
139 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
138 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvLFG6o3mp.ttf
55 ms
box_shadow.png
66 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
66 ms
callcenter.ae accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
callcenter.ae best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
callcenter.ae SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callcenter.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Callcenter.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
callcenter.ae
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Call Center. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: