Tools & Wizards About Us
callmap.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

callmap.net

Callmap | logiciel de gestion des services à la personne

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

918 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

576 ms

callmap.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Callmap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about callmap.net

Simplifiez la gestion de votre activité SAP avec un logiciel complet : planning, facturation, paye, télégestion. Démo gratuite

Visit callmap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Callmap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 918 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

callmap.net performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.361

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.callmap.net

918 ms

analytics.js

46 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

125 ms

rss-news-display.css

203 ms

css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Callmap.net, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (918 ms) belongs to the original domain Callmap.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 206.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Callmap.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 78.2 kB

  • Original 96.7 kB
  • After minification 92.4 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 73.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Callmap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 327.5 kB
  • After minification 327.5 kB
  • After compression 280.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callmap.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Callmap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.callmap.net

www.callmap.net

918 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

125 ms

rss-news-display.css

rss-news-display.css

203 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

69 ms

style.css

style.css

240 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

243 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

245 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

249 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

256 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

367 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

318 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

322 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

326 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

61 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

373 ms

display-structure.css

display-structure.css

300 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

358 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

361 ms

custom.js

custom.js

367 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

383 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

406 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

434 ms

pum-site-scripts.js

pum-site-scripts.js

440 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

445 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

452 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

465 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

488 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

510 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

517 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

525 ms

front-end-deps.js

front-end-deps.js

738 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

549 ms

style.css

style.css

385 ms

css

css

19 ms

LOGO.png

LOGO.png

245 ms

parapluie-01.png

parapluie-01.png

480 ms

wordcloud3.png

wordcloud3.png

337 ms

Fotolia_76350044_L.jpg

Fotolia_76350044_L.jpg

475 ms

computer-1185637_1280.jpg

computer-1185637_1280.jpg

392 ms

workbook-1205068_1280.jpg

workbook-1205068_1280.jpg

313 ms

acces.png

acces.png

248 ms

folder.png

folder.png

313 ms

gear.png

gear.png

353 ms

collaborative.png

collaborative.png

357 ms

entreprise.jpg

entreprise.jpg

420 ms

reseau.jpg

reseau.jpg

433 ms

sap.jpg

sap.jpg

439 ms

certification-qualiopi.png

certification-qualiopi.png

470 ms

bckg-clouds.jpg

bckg-clouds.jpg

503 ms

tick-inside-circle.png

tick-inside-circle.png

475 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

36 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

202 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

206 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

206 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

206 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

203 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

205 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

202 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

481 ms

Accessibility Review

callmap.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

callmap.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

callmap.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callmap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Callmap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

callmap.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Callmap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: