19.2 sec in total
6.4 sec
12.5 sec
274 ms
Welcome to calpack.com homepage info - get ready to check Calpack best content right away, or after learning these important things about calpack.com
California Packaging Centers specializes in custom food packaging and dry blending. From project inception through program maintenance, we can help!
Visit calpack.comWe analyzed Calpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.4 sec and then it took 12.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
calpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value18.5 s
0/100
25%
Value32.4 s
0/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value23.9 s
1/100
10%
6447 ms
51 ms
87 ms
15 ms
257 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Calpack.com, 24% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Calpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 180.3 kB (8%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Calpack.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Calpack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Calpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)
14
5
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Calpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.calpack.com
6447 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
51 ms
style.min.css
87 ms
css
15 ms
style.css
257 ms
dashicons.min.css
340 ms
jquery.js
381 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
411 ms
et-core-unified-17040550334318.min.css
447 ms
custom.min.js
519 ms
common.js
564 ms
wp-embed.min.js
576 ms
321_CalPack1.jpg
349 ms
Building-Web-Page1.jpg
490 ms
cpc-50-years.png
585 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
11 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
23 ms
modules.ttf
564 ms
calpack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
calpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
calpack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Calpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Calpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
calpack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Calpack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: