25 sec in total
579 ms
23.7 sec
793 ms
Welcome to came.in homepage info - get ready to check Came best content right away, or after learning these important things about came.in
Visit came.inWe analyzed Came.in page load time and found that the first response time was 579 ms and then it took 24.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
came.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value1,080 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
579 ms
209 ms
332 ms
341 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Came.in, 10% (5 requests) were made to and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cookie-cdn.cookiepro.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Came.com.
Page size can be reduced by 272.4 kB (5%)
5.2 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Came.in main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Came images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 49 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Came.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)
40
25
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Came. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
in
579 ms
209 ms
332 ms
en
341 ms
otSDKStub.js
36 ms
css_uIqRLVIHm8WdwgHDsO2vLBaca6M9l_rvIw6WiDiPTWE.css
236 ms
css_AHcd1qbDC3nPBLUrGj7Zl2zSz4KZFrP3DHWK4xZ3FI4.css
793 ms
js_0zWD_DunxGImHEQO-n_X9PDR3NtPm2eCNq1pafH9vXc.js
421 ms
8b59cd99-5452-441a-8863-a4f314ed3e2e.json
34 ms
location
37 ms
js_jUArVT1wR_sAWEjHwLOikTDK5d1heBAXpTlduItKkWk.js
1355 ms
sitesearch360-v13.min.js
34 ms
otBannerSdk.js
17 ms
gtm.js
122 ms
logo.svg
156 ms
automazioni-cancelli-garage-porte-small_0.svg
157 ms
videocitofonia-small_0.svg
117 ms
controllo-accessi-small_0.svg
223 ms
gestione-parcheggi-small_0.svg
242 ms
protezione-aree-sensibili-small_0.svg
243 ms
automazione-tende-small_1.svg
332 ms
sistemi-allarme-small_0.svg
363 ms
domotica-termoregolazione-small_0.svg
364 ms
casa_passiva.jpg
1170 ms
Schermata%202018-02-19%20alle%2017.37.45_2.png
939 ms
logo-50-gradient.png
579 ms
KL83DwGJhc3nxAGvpzEkjwGFQY2BhBgZGACquRhYPwfxgDShVUUAKcdCXAAAHicY2BgYGQAgisqM9VA9KGpJx7DaABHPQe9AAA=
36 ms
Nw8BiYXN58QBr6cxJI8BhUGNgYQYGRgAqrkYWD8H8YA0oVVFACnHQlwAAB4nGNgYGBkAIIrKjPVQPShV9x7YDQAQYEGnwAA
35 ms
BoUAAA==
34 ms
HwYlAAA=
35 ms
icons.woff
362 ms
gEBf46DAAAAAVtgXwoAAA==
35 ms
HP_50th_3200x1800.jpg
1183 ms
1_LS4_COVER.png
20233 ms
LT4_bannerHP_0.png
819 ms
8067S-0270-compressed_1%20%281%29.jpeg
350 ms
zlx-banner.jpg
638 ms
TTS-1600x900.jpg
685 ms
banner-gt_hp.jpg
1636 ms
_TON9145.jpg
1371 ms
shutterstock_360575582.jpg
1020 ms
_TON1081.jpg
1166 ms
banner_1087_3.jpg
1469 ms
1%20%2834%29_0.jpg
1503 ms
mondorf_4_0.jpg
1846 ms
porsche_foto-di-apertura_0.jpg
1585 ms
eiffel_tower_1_1.png
1708 ms
028-came_1.jpg
1838 ms
came-connect.png
1804 ms
ss360-unibox-v13.chunk.27665f6cc18723c8c279.js
33 ms
js
36 ms
api.ipify.org
119 ms
came.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
came.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
came.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Came.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Came.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
came.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Came. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: