2.3 sec in total
229 ms
1.6 sec
441 ms
Click here to check amazing Campfire Compare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about campfirecompare.com
Comparisons of portable propane campfires and fire pits. Features, prices and specifications for all top brands. Top ten considerations when making a purchase.
Visit campfirecompare.comWe analyzed Campfirecompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
campfirecompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value2,180 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.115
86/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
229 ms
102 ms
149 ms
149 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Campfirecompare.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (358 ms) belongs to the original domain Campfirecompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 44.1 kB (14%)
324.5 kB
280.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Campfirecompare.com main page is 324.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 150.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 374 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Campfire Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Campfirecompare.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (71%)
31
9
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Campfire Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
campfirecompare.com
229 ms
bootstrap.min.css
102 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
149 ms
flexslider.css
149 ms
style.css
135 ms
font-awesome.min.css
14 ms
jcarousel.css
152 ms
default.css
151 ms
jquery.js
197 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
200 ms
bootstrap.min.js
215 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
213 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
225 ms
prettify.js
224 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
288 ms
setting.js
264 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
299 ms
animate.js
296 ms
custom.js
333 ms
css
26 ms
prettify.css
168 ms
font-awesome.css
222 ms
custom-fonts.css
230 ms
overwrite.css
233 ms
animate.css
251 ms
analytics.js
270 ms
gtm.js
206 ms
toplogo2.png
153 ms
banner3.jpg
150 ms
banner2.jpg
149 ms
banner.jpg
325 ms
gtm.js
256 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
82 ms
collect
117 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
35 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
73 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
358 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
86 ms
collect
51 ms
campfirecompare.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
campfirecompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
campfirecompare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Campfirecompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Campfirecompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
campfirecompare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Campfire Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: