9.5 sec in total
1.5 sec
6.4 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Canterburyonthelake content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about canterburyonthelake.com
Canterbury-on-the-Lake welcomes you to enjoy a retirement lifestyle in our senior living & community homes in Waterford, MI. We offer independent living, assisted living, memory care, and more.
Visit canterburyonthelake.comWe analyzed Canterburyonthelake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
canterburyonthelake.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value25.2 s
0/100
25%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
Value48,620 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.115
86/100
15%
Value60.6 s
0/100
10%
1503 ms
171 ms
148 ms
149 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Canterburyonthelake.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Canterburyonthelake.com.
Page size can be reduced by 156.3 kB (12%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Canterburyonthelake.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 945.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Canterburyonthelake images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 268 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Canterburyonthelake.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (83%)
76
13
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Canterburyonthelake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.canterburyonthelake.com
1503 ms
autoptimize_single_f57d058bd0471a0522e79782d65bd1a7.css
171 ms
autoptimize_single_36346596dc2ce14970b296c84cf93816.css
148 ms
base.min.css
149 ms
autoptimize_single_f1f55666dae4a0c67ef3a083c715214f.css
153 ms
autoptimize_single_b721212ebcfd1c5ad8875b065882dc13.css
169 ms
autoptimize_single_9a738d4b5f2c5219189be09069faca60.css
230 ms
jquery.min.js
288 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
275 ms
js
169 ms
5d34cceb8997143d8eab15b.js
166 ms
css
135 ms
lazysizes.min.js
236 ms
formreset.min.css
238 ms
formsmain.min.css
238 ms
readyclass.min.css
572 ms
browsers.min.css
573 ms
hustle-icons.min.css
592 ms
hustle-global.min.css
592 ms
hustle-info.min.css
593 ms
hustle-slidein.min.css
826 ms
autoptimize_single_3d4a5c01a3a4ff86e9229c432987891b.js
995 ms
hustle-ui.min.js
994 ms
underscore.min.js
1011 ms
front.min.js
1063 ms
autoptimize_single_e01c3e36a523f60f22badd88e4c41430.js
1063 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
1222 ms
autoptimize_single_38073fb3e407b83269b523853332c392.js
1233 ms
autoptimize_single_bd97f5b3d310497c8dbcfb1fac8774bb.js
1230 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
1372 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1504 ms
jquery.mask.min.js
1525 ms
slick.min.js
1537 ms
autoptimize_single_94027c5a70b59785b9fdd8a19073af1e.js
1674 ms
autoptimize_single_d8367b2a4bcf51276ee9d09668d8240f.js
1651 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1708 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1737 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1734 ms
hooks.min.js
1748 ms
api.js
133 ms
swap.js
129 ms
i18n.min.js
1757 ms
a11y.min.js
1674 ms
jquery.json.min.js
1877 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1891 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
1887 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
1869 ms
gtm.js
555 ms
hotjar-2288448.js
720 ms
search.svg
1778 ms
lk-icon.png
2476 ms
dotted-divider.png
2544 ms
conversion_async.js
542 ms
PTSerif-Web-Regular.woff
2407 ms
PTSerif-Web-BoldItalic.woff
2785 ms
PTSerif-Web-Italic.woff
2784 ms
Poppins-Light.woff
2671 ms
Poppins-Regular.woff
2716 ms
Poppins-Bold.woff
2889 ms
arrow-down.png
2713 ms
COTL-Logo-2C.png
219 ms
hustle-icons-font.woff
2780 ms
hero.jpg
581 ms
L443-41916-JD-Power-Imagery_1081x1081_v01_sk5.jpg
438 ms
analytics.js
328 ms
fbevents.js
226 ms
js
105 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
272 ms
504 ms
645 ms
identity.js
79 ms
413457950044021
329 ms
collect
144 ms
collect
259 ms
134 ms
48 ms
ga-audiences
57 ms
Image1.jpg
1833 ms
recaptcha__en.js
944 ms
external_forms.js
1214 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
630 ms
gallery-arrow.png
899 ms
next.png
900 ms
collect
153 ms
canterburyonthelake.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
canterburyonthelake.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
canterburyonthelake.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Canterburyonthelake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Canterburyonthelake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
canterburyonthelake.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Canterburyonthelake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: