13.4 sec in total
2.6 sec
10.5 sec
303 ms
Click here to check amazing Cape Cleaning Company content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about capecleaningcompany.co.za
Visit capecleaningcompany.co.zaWe analyzed Capecleaningcompany.co.za page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
capecleaningcompany.co.za performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value20.3 s
0/100
25%
Value22.5 s
0/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
2603 ms
33 ms
520 ms
36 ms
780 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (107 requests) were addressed to the original Capecleaningcompany.co.za, 12% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Capecleaningcompany.co.za.
Page size can be reduced by 142.8 kB (6%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Capecleaningcompany.co.za main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cape Cleaning Company images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Capecleaningcompany.co.za has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (85%)
111
17
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cape Cleaning Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 76 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.capecleaningcompany.co.za
2603 ms
css
33 ms
layerslider.css
520 ms
css
36 ms
style.min.css
780 ms
styles.css
777 ms
style.css
778 ms
font-awesome.min.css
785 ms
style.min.css
787 ms
style.css
789 ms
dripicons.css
1037 ms
stylesheet.min.css
1569 ms
print.css
1041 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
1045 ms
style_dynamic.css
1050 ms
responsive.min.css
1052 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
1297 ms
js_composer.min.css
1596 ms
custom_css.css
1306 ms
smartslider.min.css
1315 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
1618 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1556 ms
layerslider.utils.js
1832 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
2097 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1817 ms
n2.min.js
1827 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
1856 ms
ss-simple.min.js
1856 ms
index.js
1837 ms
index.js
1845 ms
qode-like.min.js
1847 ms
core.min.js
1878 ms
accordion.min.js
1877 ms
menu.min.js
2115 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
2116 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2163 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2164 ms
dom-ready.min.js
2169 ms
js
60 ms
hooks.min.js
2169 ms
i18n.min.js
2093 ms
a11y.min.js
1846 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1846 ms
controlgroup.min.js
1849 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
1846 ms
button.min.js
1854 ms
datepicker.min.js
2089 ms
mouse.min.js
1850 ms
resizable.min.js
1847 ms
draggable.min.js
1843 ms
dialog.min.js
1846 ms
droppable.min.js
1842 ms
progressbar.min.js
1839 ms
selectable.min.js
1836 ms
sortable.min.js
1831 ms
slider.min.js
1592 ms
spinner.min.js
1556 ms
tooltip.min.js
1523 ms
tabs.min.js
1766 ms
effect.min.js
1583 ms
effect-blind.min.js
1580 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
1551 ms
effect-clip.min.js
1553 ms
effect-drop.min.js
1554 ms
effect-explode.min.js
1577 ms
effect-fade.min.js
1577 ms
effect-fold.min.js
1576 ms
ga.js
106 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
1549 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
1551 ms
effect-size.min.js
1479 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
84 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
96 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
96 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
96 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
95 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
93 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
151 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
152 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
150 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
152 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtXK-F2qO0g.woff
149 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJh1Zyc6FYw.woff
153 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJh1Zyc6FYw.woff
154 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJh1Zyc6FYw.woff
153 ms
__utm.gif
58 ms
effect-scale.min.js
1560 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1522 ms
effect-slide.min.js
1520 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
1520 ms
plugins.js
2044 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
1511 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
1580 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1578 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1579 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1576 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1579 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1812 ms
jquery.stretch.js
1577 ms
imagesloaded.js
1691 ms
rangeslider.min.js
1693 ms
jquery.event.move.js
1683 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
1822 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1832 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1598 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
1593 ms
default_dynamic.js
1589 ms
default.min.js
1596 ms
custom_js.js
1831 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1842 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1594 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1848 ms
capecleaningcompanylogo_small.fw_.png
1863 ms
tmountain-grey.jpg
2630 ms
f1.jpg
1837 ms
Tile-Cleaning-Deep-South.jpg
1858 ms
windowcleaningimage.jpg
1608 ms
cleaningcarpets.jpg
2101 ms
site-pics.jpg-carpets-2-400x400.jpg
1847 ms
site-pics.jpg-tiles2-400x400.jpg
1852 ms
site-pics.jpg-windows3-400x400.jpg
1851 ms
site-pics.jpg-carpets-1-400x400.jpg
1847 ms
site-pics.jpgs1-tiles-1-400x400.jpg
1856 ms
site-web-windows1-400x400.jpg
1854 ms
Jobs-completed-March-2019-1200x400.png
2367 ms
www.capecleaningcompany.co.za
2646 ms
capecleaningcompany.co.za accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
capecleaningcompany.co.za best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
capecleaningcompany.co.za SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Capecleaningcompany.co.za can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Capecleaningcompany.co.za main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
capecleaningcompany.co.za
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cape Cleaning Company. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: