2.4 sec in total
79 ms
1.8 sec
597 ms
Visit cardfellow.com now to see the best up-to-date Cardfellow content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cardfellow.com
Quickly compare credit card processing companies. Receive instant rate quotes, read processor reviews, and save 40% on credit card processing.
Visit cardfellow.comWe analyzed Cardfellow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cardfellow.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
79 ms
278 ms
22 ms
72 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Cardfellow.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.livechatinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (56%)
2.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Cardfellow.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cardfellow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 472.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cardfellow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 472.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (69%)
85
26
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cardfellow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cardfellow.com
79 ms
3686590404.js
278 ms
style.css
22 ms
fg.menu.css
72 ms
styles.css
55 ms
css
109 ms
stylesheet.css
72 ms
media_query.css
71 ms
jquery-ui.css
70 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
69 ms
style.css
76 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
78 ms
prettify.css
79 ms
simplePagination.css
77 ms
alertify.core.css
78 ms
alertify.default.css
80 ms
front.end.css
78 ms
jquery.js
97 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
79 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
96 ms
jquery-ui.js
99 ms
fg.menu.js
81 ms
prettify.js
77 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
88 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
88 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
87 ms
jquery.simplePagination.js
86 ms
kalypto.js
96 ms
jquery.responsiveTabs.js
98 ms
popupwindow.js
96 ms
alertify.min.js
97 ms
custom-front-end.js
99 ms
recaptcha.css
97 ms
css
106 ms
css
116 ms
conversion_async.js
89 ms
modernizr.js
103 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
103 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
100 ms
main.js
99 ms
jquery.form.min.js
97 ms
scripts.js
96 ms
comment-reply.min.js
99 ms
wp-embed.min.js
98 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
108 ms
analytics.js
367 ms
logo-home.png
31 ms
home-bg.jpg
321 ms
screenshot-1.png
295 ms
processor.png
295 ms
screenshot-2.png
293 ms
v-logo.png
291 ms
imegenico.png
293 ms
first-data.png
297 ms
authorise.png
294 ms
forbs.png
294 ms
the-newyark.png
295 ms
slide1.jpg
303 ms
slide2.jpg
295 ms
slide3.jpg
294 ms
slide4.jpg
312 ms
slide5.jpg
313 ms
iframe_api
386 ms
tracking.js
419 ms
footer_logo.gif
45 ms
g-plus.gif
45 ms
twitter.gif
44 ms
fb.gif
45 ms
linkedin.gif
47 ms
blackbg-transperent.png
48 ms
hmbanner_black-transperent.png
58 ms
blue_check_icon.png
46 ms
white-check.png
56 ms
quote-start.gif
55 ms
quote-end.gif
56 ms
tk-4V9w6ryI
121 ms
left-blue-arrow.png
42 ms
right-blue-arrow.png
44 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
67 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
79 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
93 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
113 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
111 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
117 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
111 ms
collect
32 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
104 ms
www-embed-player.js
119 ms
base.js
162 ms
www-widgetapi.js
66 ms
script_data.js
271 ms
1eJU4PjErWSV5LNTKFXcze5UHikZLg3viIH581vcHWA.js
41 ms
ad_status.js
46 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
19 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
cardfellow.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
cardfellow.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cardfellow.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cardfellow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cardfellow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cardfellow.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cardfellow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: