Tools & Wizards About Us
caregroup.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

caregroup.cc

Luxury Apartments for Sale in Beirut: The Real Estate Agency Broker for Apartments for Sale Solidere Lebanon Ashrafieh Down Town

Page Load Speed

27.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

23.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

caregroup.cc screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Caregroup content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about caregroup.cc

Care Group is the Number 1 TOP best Real Estate Agency Company and Broker with Exclusive Selling right to the most Luxury Apartments in Lebanon Beirut, Ashrafieh Apartments for sale, SOLDERE Stores an...

Visit caregroup.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Caregroup.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 26.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

caregroup.cc performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

caregroup.cc

1279 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

163 ms

css

75 ms

genericons.css

236 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Caregroup.cc, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Dev.ibaroody.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Dev.ibaroody.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 749.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

7.4 MB

After Optimization

6.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Caregroup.cc main page is 7.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 79.5 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 76.6 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 591.6 kB

  • Original 7.0 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Caregroup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 166.7 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB
  • After compression 130.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 104.2 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 62.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Caregroup.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (35%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

53

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caregroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

caregroup.cc

caregroup.cc

1279 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

163 ms

css

css

75 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

236 ms

style.css

style.css

158 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

244 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

199 ms

slick.css

slick.css

198 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

237 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

237 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

359 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

bootstrap-theme.css

299 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

314 ms

smdevice-style.css

smdevice-style.css

316 ms

xsdevice-style.css

xsdevice-style.css

317 ms

customjs.css

customjs.css

315 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

371 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

394 ms

customjs.js

customjs.js

393 ms

customjs13.js

customjs13.js

392 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

408 ms

pano2vr_player.js

pano2vr_player.js

513 ms

skin.js

skin.js

430 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

472 ms

functions.js

functions.js

472 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

471 ms

care-group-logo.jpg

care-group-logo.jpg

198 ms

crosshair.png

crosshair.png

19938 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

316 ms

Parc-Clemenceau_featured-1-371x297.jpg

Parc-Clemenceau_featured-1-371x297.jpg

163 ms

16-371x297.png

16-371x297.png

398 ms

10-371x297.png

10-371x297.png

384 ms

6-371x297.png

6-371x297.png

533 ms

3-371x297.png

3-371x297.png

381 ms

2-371x297.png

2-371x297.png

461 ms

1-1-371x297.png

1-1-371x297.png

549 ms

36-371x297.png

36-371x297.png

535 ms

34-371x297.png

34-371x297.png

538 ms

33-371x297.png

33-371x297.png

553 ms

7-371x297.png

7-371x297.png

619 ms

20-371x297.png

20-371x297.png

837 ms

35-371x297.png

35-371x297.png

617 ms

23-371x297.png

23-371x297.png

619 ms

17-371x297.png

17-371x297.png

702 ms

21-371x297.png

21-371x297.png

638 ms

15-371x297.png

15-371x297.png

695 ms

31-371x297.png

31-371x297.png

695 ms

4-371x297.png

4-371x297.png

698 ms

13-371x297.png

13-371x297.png

719 ms

11-371x297.png

11-371x297.png

783 ms

25-371x297.png

25-371x297.png

784 ms

14-371x297.png

14-371x297.png

784 ms

28-371x297.png

28-371x297.png

789 ms

9-371x297.png

9-371x297.png

794 ms

24-371x297.png

24-371x297.png

864 ms

32-371x297.png

32-371x297.png

866 ms

30-371x297.png

30-371x297.png

864 ms

29-371x297.png

29-371x297.png

876 ms

8-371x297.png

8-371x297.png

883 ms

27-371x297.png

27-371x297.png

988 ms

18-371x297.png

18-371x297.png

942 ms

5featured-371x297.jpg

5featured-371x297.jpg

939 ms

12-371x297.png

12-371x297.png

941 ms

image_1.png

image_1.png

19919 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

142 ms

status.php

status.php

358 ms

jquery.livehelp.js

jquery.livehelp.js

342 ms

latest-news.png

latest-news.png

812 ms

arrow-prev.png

arrow-prev.png

808 ms

atrk.gif

atrk.gif

59 ms

test.png

test.png

197 ms

arrow-next.png

arrow-next.png

715 ms

latest-news-background.png

latest-news-background.png

650 ms

css

css

17 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

82 ms

31.gif

31.gif

1193 ms

pano.xml

pano.xml

95 ms

about-backgroundnew.png

about-backgroundnew.png

717 ms

raleway-medium-webfont.woff

raleway-medium-webfont.woff

237 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

314 ms

MyriadPro-Regular.woff

MyriadPro-Regular.woff

307 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

299 ms

raleway-semibold-webfont.woff

raleway-semibold-webfont.woff

298 ms

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

300 ms

oswald-light-webfont.woff

oswald-light-webfont.woff

650 ms

raleway-regular-webfont.woff

raleway-regular-webfont.woff

651 ms

raleway-light-webfont.woff

raleway-light-webfont.woff

652 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

215 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

527 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

493 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

492 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

527 ms

tile_0.jpg

tile_0.jpg

527 ms

SEO Factors

caregroup.cc SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caregroup.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Caregroup.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

caregroup.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Caregroup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: