Tools & Wizards About Us
casecorrect.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

casecorrect.com

Case Study Solution | Case Study Analysis and Case Study Help

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

759 ms

casecorrect.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Case Correct content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about casecorrect.com

Help with online assistance in the Case Solutions by our professional Case Research Company. Online Professional Case Research study Option and aid in case research study composing service consisting ...

Visit casecorrect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Casecorrect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casecorrect.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

casecorrect.com

57 ms

casecorrect.com

143 ms

bootstrap.min.css

87 ms

animate.css

951 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

522 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Casecorrect.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Static.getbutton.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Casecorrect.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

985.9 kB

After Optimization

887.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Casecorrect.com main page is 985.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 600.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 600.0 kB
  • After minification 543.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Case Correct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 281.0 kB
  • After minification 280.9 kB
  • After compression 274.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 66.9 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casecorrect.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Case Correct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

casecorrect.com

casecorrect.com

57 ms

casecorrect.com

casecorrect.com

143 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

87 ms

animate.css

animate.css

951 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

522 ms

all.css

all.css

93 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

96 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

586 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1292 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1260 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1298 ms

style.css

style.css

1319 ms

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

1314 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1307 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1321 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

1407 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1841 ms

jquery.filterizr.min.js

jquery.filterizr.min.js

1940 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2288 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

2413 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

2460 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

2479 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

2499 ms

contact.js

contact.js

2505 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

2510 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

2523 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

2536 ms

mail-script.js

mail-script.js

2552 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2585 ms

css

css

36 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

105 ms

init.js

init.js

180 ms

1BLEB7U2-c52DPlk2.html

1BLEB7U2-c52DPlk2.html

112 ms

CaseCorrect.png

CaseCorrect.png

1232 ms

banner_bg.png

banner_bg.png

1246 ms

Introduction-and-Background-Information.webp

Introduction-and-Background-Information.webp

1247 ms

Four-Elements-of-SWOT-Analysis-and-its-Usage-in-Case-Study-Solution-Decision-Making.webp

Four-Elements-of-SWOT-Analysis-and-its-Usage-in-Case-Study-Solution-Decision-Making.webp

1285 ms

Strengths.webp

Strengths.webp

1273 ms

Weaknesses.webp

Weaknesses.webp

1397 ms

Opportunities.webp

Opportunities.webp

1443 ms

Threats.webp

Threats.webp

1842 ms

Decision-Making.webp

Decision-Making.webp

2321 ms

feature_icon_1.svg

feature_icon_1.svg

2804 ms

feature_icon_2.svg

feature_icon_2.svg

2970 ms

feature_icon_3.svg

feature_icon_3.svg

3038 ms

whatsappnumber-bg.png

whatsappnumber-bg.png

3074 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

34 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

3024 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

3041 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

40 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

48 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

48 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

47 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

3060 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

47 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

15 ms

1BLEB7U2-c52DPlk2.js

1BLEB7U2-c52DPlk2.js

75 ms

Accessibility Review

casecorrect.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

casecorrect.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

casecorrect.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casecorrect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casecorrect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casecorrect.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Case Correct. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: