Tools & Wizards About Us
casepoint.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    61% of websites

casepoint.in

Legal eDiscovery & Compliance Software Solutions | Casepoint

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

4.7 sec

casepoint.in screenshot

About Website

Visit casepoint.in now to see the best up-to-date Casepoint content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about casepoint.in

Leading corporations, government agencies & law firms choose Casepoint’s legal discovery platform for eDiscovery, investigations, data privacy & compliance

Visit casepoint.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Casepoint.in page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casepoint.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,940 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.313

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.casepoint.com

69 ms

front.used.css

20 ms

lazyload.min.js

59 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

81 ms

maxmegamenu.js

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Casepoint.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (921 ms) relates to the external source Casepoint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

474.8 kB

After Optimization

340.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Casepoint.in main page is 474.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 277.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 118.7 kB

  • Original 143.4 kB
  • After minification 136.0 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 277.2 kB
  • After minification 271.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Casepoint images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 44.6 kB
  • After compression 37.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casepoint.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (8%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

54

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Casepoint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.casepoint.com

www.casepoint.com

69 ms

front.used.css

front.used.css

20 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

59 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

81 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

115 ms

link-arrow.png

link-arrow.png

61 ms

down-arrow1.svg

down-arrow1.svg

61 ms

up-arrow.svg

up-arrow.svg

91 ms

testimonial_quote.svg

testimonial_quote.svg

107 ms

testimonial_quote-left.svg

testimonial_quote-left.svg

107 ms

SS-Artificial-Intelligence-01.svg

SS-Artificial-Intelligence-01.svg

281 ms

SS-Cloud-Analytics-Collection.svg

SS-Cloud-Analytics-Collection.svg

278 ms

SS-Review-Production1-1.svg

SS-Review-Production1-1.svg

485 ms

SS-Security.svg

SS-Security.svg

488 ms

casepoint-logo.png

casepoint-logo.png

76 ms

United_States_Department_of_Defense_Seal-1.svg

United_States_Department_of_Defense_Seal-1.svg

96 ms

beveridge-diamond.png

beveridge-diamond.png

81 ms

BNSF.svg

BNSF.svg

81 ms

mayo-clinic.png

mayo-clinic.png

94 ms

cohen-milstein.svg

cohen-milstein.svg

273 ms

crowell-morning.png

crowell-morning.png

271 ms

Department_of_Business.png

Department_of_Business.png

271 ms

Hausfeld.png

Hausfeld.png

275 ms

larkin-hoffman.png

larkin-hoffman.png

271 ms

levellegal.svg

levellegal.svg

277 ms

Marriott.svg

Marriott.svg

282 ms

NCUA.svg

NCUA.svg

334 ms

peckar-and-abramson.png

peckar-and-abramson.png

316 ms

robbins-russell.png

robbins-russell.png

313 ms

ryley-carlock.png

ryley-carlock.png

302 ms

schwartz-shaw.png

schwartz-shaw.png

286 ms

SEC.svg

SEC.svg

343 ms

stoel-rives.png

stoel-rives.png

299 ms

United_States_Forest_Service.svg

United_States_Forest_Service.svg

305 ms

united-states-courts.svg

united-states-courts.svg

315 ms

VA.svg

VA.svg

499 ms

vandeventer-black.svg

vandeventer-black.svg

481 ms

west-virginia-office-of-technology.png

west-virginia-office-of-technology.png

477 ms

Wheeler-Trigg.png

Wheeler-Trigg.png

478 ms

Group-138.svg

Group-138.svg

477 ms

refresh-icon-teal.jpg

refresh-icon-teal.jpg

476 ms

lock-icon-yellow.jpg

lock-icon-yellow.jpg

492 ms

Artificial-Intelligence.svg

Artificial-Intelligence.svg

492 ms

Cloud-Analytics-and-Collections-1.svg

Cloud-Analytics-and-Collections-1.svg

487 ms

Data-Processing.svg

Data-Processing.svg

706 ms

Review-_-Production.svg

Review-_-Production.svg

450 ms

Security.svg

Security.svg

706 ms

SS-Data-Processing-3.svg

SS-Data-Processing-3.svg

688 ms

marriott-opt.png

marriott-opt.png

684 ms

mayo-clinic-logo.png

mayo-clinic-logo.png

674 ms

Fortune-500-Construction-01-1.svg

Fortune-500-Construction-01-1.svg

748 ms

peckar-and-abramson-2.png

peckar-and-abramson-2.png

663 ms

Stearns-Weaver-Miller-Weissler-Alhadeff-Sitterson-1.png

Stearns-Weaver-Miller-Weissler-Alhadeff-Sitterson-1.png

736 ms

burney-consultant2.png

burney-consultant2.png

668 ms

bever-ridge-opt.png

bever-ridge-opt.png

921 ms

SS-Cloud-Analytics-Collection.svg

SS-Cloud-Analytics-Collection.svg

713 ms

SS-Artificial-Intelligence-01.svg

SS-Artificial-Intelligence-01.svg

571 ms

font.woff

font.woff

559 ms

font.woff

font.woff

789 ms

font.woff

font.woff

564 ms

font.woff

font.woff

754 ms

font.woff

font.woff

754 ms

font.woff

font.woff

749 ms

Socialico.ttf

Socialico.ttf

762 ms

customer-success-graphic.svg

customer-success-graphic.svg

740 ms

22-09-26-Spotlight-page-What-is-eDiscovery-Software-1.svg

22-09-26-Spotlight-page-What-is-eDiscovery-Software-1.svg

760 ms

22-09-23-A-Complete-Guide-to-eDiscovery-Software-Feature-Image-1.svg

22-09-23-A-Complete-Guide-to-eDiscovery-Software-Feature-Image-1.svg

748 ms

22-09-14-Data-Collections-eDiscovery-in-the-Cloud.svg

22-09-14-Data-Collections-eDiscovery-in-the-Cloud.svg

721 ms

Logo-01.svg

Logo-01.svg

735 ms

SS-Review-Production1-1.svg

SS-Review-Production1-1.svg

611 ms

SS-Security.svg

SS-Security.svg

728 ms

Accessibility Review

casepoint.in accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

casepoint.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

casepoint.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casepoint.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casepoint.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casepoint.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Casepoint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: