2.1 sec in total
178 ms
922 ms
1 sec
Visit castingwords.net now to see the best up-to-date Castingwords content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about castingwords.net
{ description }
Visit castingwords.netWe analyzed Castingwords.net page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
castingwords.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
178 ms
13 ms
30 ms
8 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Castingwords.net, 56% (18 requests) were made to Castingwords.com and 22% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (300 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 398.2 kB (49%)
816.9 kB
418.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Castingwords.net main page is 816.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 417.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Castingwords images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 335.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 335.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Castingwords.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)
23
11
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Castingwords. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
castingwords.net
178 ms
castingwords.com
13 ms
castingwords.com
30 ms
app.css
8 ms
instant_page_3_0_0.js
60 ms
qll5szo.css
300 ms
vendor.js
71 ms
app.js
102 ms
analytics.js
90 ms
Header_Section_2048_opt.jpeg
71 ms
TopNavLogo.png
69 ms
Budget.png
69 ms
1Week.png
69 ms
1Day.png
68 ms
ProductDiv.png
70 ms
International.png
75 ms
front_page_proof.png
76 ms
pinterest.png
74 ms
twitter.png
75 ms
linkedin.png
74 ms
fb.png
73 ms
ec.js
99 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
35 ms
ga-audiences
81 ms
p.css
76 ms
d
34 ms
d
103 ms
d
197 ms
d
172 ms
d
115 ms
d
115 ms
castingwords.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
castingwords.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
castingwords.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Castingwords.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Castingwords.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
castingwords.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Castingwords. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: