11.1 sec in total
45 ms
10.5 sec
522 ms
Welcome to ccmark.com homepage info - get ready to check CCMARK best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ccmark.com
Cmark produces Animated Logo and Logo creation with Cmark is a very easy process. We would like you to scan the sample Logo's and Animated Backgrounds and choose one that “SPEAKS” to you. Please fill ...
Visit ccmark.comWe analyzed Ccmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ccmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value3,540 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
45 ms
2864 ms
204 ms
263 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Ccmark.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 15% (11 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 396.6 kB (20%)
1.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ccmark.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CCMARK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 160.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ccmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.0 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (46%)
61
33
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CCMARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ccmark.com
45 ms
ccmark.com
2864 ms
autoptimize_646545d0192145c0c74b6c31653312c6.css
204 ms
autoptimize_874a1dfaeed4d61da8a582a829fdfd20.css
263 ms
js
217 ms
css
201 ms
css
676 ms
css
719 ms
css
719 ms
css
712 ms
css
712 ms
css
711 ms
css
712 ms
css
731 ms
css
731 ms
css
731 ms
jquery.min.js
248 ms
video.min.js
190 ms
autoptimize_single_f5dace82280823130bf50af2ece7214e.js
175 ms
autoptimize_single_fe0eb964c2dfe13878cda5f59e6c1c7c.js
182 ms
s-202239.js
240 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
702 ms
font-awesome.min.css
241 ms
e-202239.js
654 ms
autoptimize_30a34ff4223882e64673c76dd57ca4e2.js
921 ms
vp_player.min.js
694 ms
analytics.js
379 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
286 ms
iframe_api
586 ms
autoptimize_dcb2de333eec7ab4ae31385ed8d6a393.css
580 ms
collect
508 ms
fbevents.js
621 ms
Corporate-screen-discussion.gif
2970 ms
Cmark-logo-8.gif
2494 ms
promo12_0.gif
2404 ms
Library-846-3.gif
6568 ms
moc-happy-computer-man.jpg
702 ms
cmark-8.jpg
701 ms
cmark-logo-bg.jpg
876 ms
moc-promo-5.jpg
875 ms
cmark-1.jpg
920 ms
linda.png
1204 ms
henry-2.jpg
1007 ms
bg_img1.png
567 ms
shadow.png
554 ms
moc-happy-computer-man.jpg
613 ms
cmark-8.jpg
612 ms
cmark-logo-bg.jpg
564 ms
moc-promo-5.jpg
701 ms
cmark-1.jpg
872 ms
pete-3.jpg
743 ms
henry-3c.jpg
742 ms
lou-1d.jpg
743 ms
paulfix3.jpg
742 ms
photo(1).jpg
873 ms
photo(2).jpg
864 ms
photo(3).jpg
864 ms
photo(4).jpg
903 ms
photo(5).jpg
900 ms
photo(6).jpg
906 ms
abstract-1278070_1280.jpg
827 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
562 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
604 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
626 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
715 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
714 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
406 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
791 ms
collect
226 ms
www-widgetapi.js
143 ms
472719819775067
141 ms
ccmark.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
ccmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ccmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ccmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ccmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ccmark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CCMARK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: