Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

centralma.crittercontrol.com

Central Massachusetts Wildlife Control & Removal | Critter Control

Page Load Speed

13.2 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

7.3 sec

centralma.crittercontrol.com screenshot

About Website

Visit centralma.crittercontrol.com now to see the best up-to-date Central Ma Critter Control content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about centralma.crittercontrol.com

Critter Control provides humane trapping & removal services for bats, squirrels, raccoons, & other nuisance wildlife in the Central Mass area. Call Today!

Visit centralma.crittercontrol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Centralma.crittercontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 13 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

centralma.crittercontrol.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value32,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.583

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

centralma.crittercontrol.com

185 ms

central-ma

672 ms

gtm.js

252 ms

main.min.css

51 ms

css

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Centralma.crittercontrol.com, 57% (36 requests) were made to Crittercontrol.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Crittercontrol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.7 kB (1%)

Content Size

13.7 MB

After Optimization

13.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Centralma.crittercontrol.com main page is 13.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 81.7 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 13.3 MB
  • After minification 13.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Central Ma Critter Control images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 167.1 kB
  • After minification 166.9 kB
  • After compression 166.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 144 B

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 35.1 kB
  • After compression 35.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Centralma.crittercontrol.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (33%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Central Ma Critter Control. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

centralma.crittercontrol.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

centralma.crittercontrol.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

centralma.crittercontrol.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Centralma.crittercontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Centralma.crittercontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Central Ma Critter Control. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: