Tools & Wizards About Us
centralvalleytalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

centralvalleytalk.com

Central Valley Talk - Fresno's Premier Internet TV Station

Page Load Speed

956 ms in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

854 ms

Page Rendered

85 ms

centralvalleytalk.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to centralvalleytalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Central Valley Talk best content right away, or after learning these important things about centralvalleytalk.com

Fresno News, Talk, and Entertainment Television that you watch on your Computer, tablet, or your Smart Phone. Located in Fresno's Historic Tower District.

Visit centralvalleytalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Centralvalleytalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 939 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

centralvalleytalk.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

centralvalleytalk.com

17 ms

centralvalleytalk.com

16 ms

swfobject.js

2 ms

widgets.js

113 ms

ga.js

550 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Centralvalleytalk.com, 40% (18 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Static.streamhoster.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (550 ms) relates to the external source Ssl.google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

787.1 kB

After Optimization

685.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Centralvalleytalk.com main page is 787.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 447.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 89.7 kB

  • Original 310.2 kB
  • After minification 220.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Central Valley Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 416 B

  • Original 447.1 kB
  • After minification 447.1 kB
  • After compression 446.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Centralvalleytalk.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (65%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Central Valley Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

centralvalleytalk.com

centralvalleytalk.com

17 ms

centralvalleytalk.com

centralvalleytalk.com

16 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

2 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

113 ms

ga.js

ga.js

550 ms

Kw6leHscDvm_5

Kw6leHscDvm_5

96 ms

Black-373x287.jpg

Black-373x287.jpg

5 ms

CVT_TV_BG-600x338.png

CVT_TV_BG-600x338.png

18 ms

BonBButtonPlaceholder.png

BonBButtonPlaceholder.png

6 ms

YouTube.png

YouTube.png

7 ms

Be_a_Guest.png

Be_a_Guest.png

7 ms

Copy.png

Copy.png

8 ms

own.show-450x60.png

own.show-450x60.png

15 ms

cvt-webbanner-logo-vertical-288x34.png

cvt-webbanner-logo-vertical-288x34.png

9 ms

Instagram-Logo-40x40.png

Instagram-Logo-40x40.png

8 ms

twitter-logo-40x40.png

twitter-logo-40x40.png

16 ms

YouTube_icon_.svg-40x28.png

YouTube_icon_.svg-40x28.png

15 ms

facebook-logo-55x55.png

facebook-logo-55x55.png

14 ms

app.css

app.css

44 ms

playerlib.min.js

playerlib.min.js

62 ms

app.extlib.js

app.extlib.js

55 ms

casting.min.js

casting.min.js

59 ms

cast_sender.js

cast_sender.js

50 ms

app.js

app.js

88 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

86 ms

settings

settings

98 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

26 ms

CVtalk

CVtalk

65 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

27 ms

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

52 ms

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

77 ms

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

85 ms

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

103 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

108 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

106 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

137 ms

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

30 ms

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

29 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

136 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

248 ms

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

27 ms

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

50 ms

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

43 ms

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

81 ms

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

centralvalleytalk.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

centralvalleytalk.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

centralvalleytalk.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Centralvalleytalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Centralvalleytalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

centralvalleytalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Central Valley Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: