Tools & Wizards About Us
ceslobe.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

ceslobe.org

Česlobe - Styčný bod Čechů a Slováků v Belgii

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

338 ms

Resources Loaded

871 ms

Page Rendered

128 ms

ceslobe.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ceslobe content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ceslobe.org

Stranky pro Cechy a Slovaky v Belgii. Stranky pre Slovakov a Cechov v Belgicku.

Visit ceslobe.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ceslobe.org page load time and found that the first response time was 338 ms and then it took 999 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ceslobe.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ceslobe.org

338 ms

ceslobe.css

145 ms

ceslobe.js

164 ms

widgets.js

5 ms

ga.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ceslobe.org, 47% (8 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 18% (3 requests) were made to Banners.wunderground.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Banners.wunderground.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

71.4 kB

After Optimization

56.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ceslobe.org main page is 71.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 302 B

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceslobe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 18.1 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 477 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceslobe.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceslobe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ceslobe.org

ceslobe.org

338 ms

ceslobe.css

ceslobe.css

145 ms

ceslobe.js

ceslobe.js

164 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

5 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

11518.gif

11518.gif

407 ms

06451.gif

06451.gif

352 ms

11816.gif

11816.gif

466 ms

logo.png

logo.png

131 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

268 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

24 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

4 ms

Accessibility Review

ceslobe.org accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

ceslobe.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ceslobe.org SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    CS

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1250

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceslobe.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Czech is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ceslobe.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1250. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ceslobe.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ceslobe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: