Tools & Wizards About Us
chamele.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

chamele.com

Chameleon Design

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

122 ms

chamele.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chamele.com homepage info - get ready to check Chamele best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about chamele.com

Chameleon are a creative consultancy delivering innovative branding, packaging, advertising and digital solutions to diverse global market sectors.

Visit chamele.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chamele.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chamele.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.323

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chamele.com

268 ms

www.chamele.com

2988 ms

logo.gif

316 ms

expand.gif

294 ms

NavS_01.gif

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Chamele.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Chamele.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.6 kB (28%)

Content Size

27.5 kB

After Optimization

19.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Chamele.com main page is 27.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (87%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chamele. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chamele.com

chamele.com

268 ms

www.chamele.com

www.chamele.com

2988 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

316 ms

expand.gif

expand.gif

294 ms

NavS_01.gif

NavS_01.gif

315 ms

Nav_02.gif

Nav_02.gif

273 ms

Nav_03.gif

Nav_03.gif

305 ms

Nav_04.gif

Nav_04.gif

244 ms

Nav_05.gif

Nav_05.gif

383 ms

Nav_06.gif

Nav_06.gif

391 ms

Nav_07.gif

Nav_07.gif

407 ms

Nav_08.gif

Nav_08.gif

410 ms

Nav_09.gif

Nav_09.gif

422 ms

v_line.gif

v_line.gif

417 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Navo_02.gif

Navo_02.gif

175 ms

Navo_03.gif

Navo_03.gif

173 ms

Navo_04.gif

Navo_04.gif

183 ms

Navo_05.gif

Navo_05.gif

218 ms

Navo_06.gif

Navo_06.gif

206 ms

Navo_07.gif

Navo_07.gif

190 ms

Navo_08.gif

Navo_08.gif

338 ms

Navo_09.gif

Navo_09.gif

352 ms

Accessibility Review

chamele.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chamele.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chamele.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chamele.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chamele.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

chamele.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chamele. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: