2.3 sec in total
308 ms
1.6 sec
445 ms
Click here to check amazing Champol content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about champol.com
Visit champol.comWe analyzed Champol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
champol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value23.6 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
308 ms
325 ms
221 ms
257 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Champol.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (788 ms) belongs to the original domain Champol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 895.3 kB (26%)
3.4 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Champol.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.5 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Champol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 315.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 315.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 468.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Champol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 468.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (39%)
71
43
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Champol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
champol.com
308 ms
bootstrap.min.css
325 ms
fonts.css
221 ms
animsition.css
257 ms
simple-line-icons.css
134 ms
owl.carousel.css
130 ms
settings.css
310 ms
MegaNavbar.min.css
335 ms
navbar-default.css
258 ms
animation.css
283 ms
style.css
383 ms
css
24 ms
us.png
336 ms
de.png
372 ms
fr.png
373 ms
ru.png
393 ms
logo-dark.png
447 ms
blog.png
571 ms
1.jpg
644 ms
2.jpg
759 ms
oil.png
586 ms
5ltr_oil.png
470 ms
gear_oil.png
524 ms
product_1_big.jpg
536 ms
Engine_Oil.png
582 ms
product_2_big.jpg
589 ms
gear_oils.png
601 ms
product_3_big.jpg
643 ms
4T.png
644 ms
product_4_big.jpg
712 ms
Coolants.png
662 ms
product_5_big.jpg
701 ms
Grease_MP3.png
718 ms
product_6_big.jpg
707 ms
Hydraulic_Oil.png
724 ms
product_7_big.jpg
766 ms
Pumpset_Oil.png
773 ms
jquery.min.js
788 ms
bootstrap.min.js
715 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
721 ms
plugins.js
659 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
645 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
649 ms
speed.css
628 ms
hinge.css
601 ms
slide.css
612 ms
bling.css
629 ms
bounce.css
636 ms
skew.css
599 ms
space.css
601 ms
scale.css
597 ms
zoom.css
617 ms
rotate.css
599 ms
flip.css
515 ms
custom.js
466 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
462 ms
product_8_big.jpg
555 ms
m_oil.png
503 ms
aboutus.jpg
597 ms
mahindra.jpg
498 ms
greaves.jpg
485 ms
tata.jpg
448 ms
Escorts_logo_1.jpg
444 ms
firstchoice.jpg
523 ms
kohler.jpg
503 ms
amazon.jpg
465 ms
flipkart.jpg
458 ms
snapdeal.png
457 ms
pattern.jpg
147 ms
OpenSans-Light.ttf
211 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
96 ms
webfont-medical-icons.ttf
170 ms
caption.jpg
110 ms
loader.gif
72 ms
timer.png
91 ms
revicons.woff
87 ms
champol.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
champol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
champol.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Champol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Champol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
champol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Champol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: