43.9 sec in total
130 ms
22.8 sec
21 sec
Welcome to charge.com homepage info - get ready to check Charge best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about charge.com
Charge.com provides high-quality merchant credit card processing services for your business. Click here to read up on all the reasons why you should choose us!
Visit charge.comWe analyzed Charge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 43.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
charge.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
130 ms
2024 ms
1159 ms
830 ms
1043 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Charge.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Charge.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (51%)
3.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Charge.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 679.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 679.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 792.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 792.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (71%)
75
22
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
charge.com
130 ms
www.charge.com
2024 ms
css
1159 ms
bootstrap.min.css
830 ms
theme-my-login.css
1043 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2023 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
974 ms
8-layout.css
973 ms
mashsb.min.css
973 ms
site.min.css
973 ms
mono-social-icons.css
1056 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.css
1056 ms
jquery.js
2019 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1986 ms
swap.js
2491 ms
phone-handling.js
1054 ms
mashsb.min.js
1055 ms
themed-profiles.js
2741 ms
css
1029 ms
skin-5980668aeff22.css
2725 ms
style.css
2724 ms
formreset.min.css
3117 ms
formsmain.min.css
2675 ms
readyclass.min.css
2674 ms
browsers.min.css
3228 ms
jquery.json.js
3228 ms
gravityforms.min.js
3228 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
3042 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
3041 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
3041 ms
8-layout.js
3043 ms
core.min.js
3090 ms
position.min.js
3043 ms
site.min.js
3042 ms
jquery.throttle.min.js
3042 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
3043 ms
bootstrap.min.js
3108 ms
theme.js
3108 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3108 ms
sticky.js
3087 ms
submit-customizatiion.js
3070 ms
conversion.js
2415 ms
misc-customizatiion.js
3069 ms
analytics-head.js
2556 ms
ydg-fixed-header.js
2395 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
2421 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1448 ms
font-awesome.min.css
360 ms
logo2.png
1000 ms
cards-300x68.png
831 ms
guarantee.png
778 ms
rating-badge-blue.png
777 ms
logo_apple.png
776 ms
rating_apple.png
777 ms
logo_nbc.png
775 ms
logo_america-online.png
811 ms
rating_america-online.png
811 ms
logo_yahoo.png
810 ms
iStock_000059841830_Small.jpg
812 ms
iStock_000026505660_Full.jpg
811 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
1203 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
1202 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
1170 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
1169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1169 ms
131500192
2388 ms
player.js
6946 ms
player.css
6722 ms
ga.js
6847 ms
vuid.min.js
3224 ms
bx_loader.gif
8928 ms
dQNL70YmBhcADHYj9AAA
189 ms
MonoSocialIconsFont-1.10.ttf
7123 ms
swap_session.js
6431 ms
gtm.js
4626 ms
hero-5.jpg
3999 ms
testimonial-bg.jpg
4001 ms
__utm.gif
2035 ms
887 ms
jquery.min.js
952 ms
analytics.js
1042 ms
defaults-gray_60x60.png
971 ms
icap.js
520 ms
collect
28 ms
charge.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
charge.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
charge.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charge.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: