1.7 sec in total
116 ms
1.5 sec
75 ms
Visit charlestonaesthetics.com now to see the best up-to-date Charleston Aesthetics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about charlestonaesthetics.com
At Charleston Aesthetics, we use only the highest quality, medical-grade products and cosmetic procedures for youth preservation and a revitalized complexion.
Visit charlestonaesthetics.comWe analyzed Charlestonaesthetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
charlestonaesthetics.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,300 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
116 ms
40 ms
50 ms
43 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Charlestonaesthetics.com, 31% (26 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 19% (16 requests) were made to Static.joinboulevard.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (969 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 5.0 MB (71%)
7.0 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Charlestonaesthetics.com main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 705.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 705.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charleston Aesthetics images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.3 MB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (53%)
53
25
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charleston Aesthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.charlestonaesthetics.com
116 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
40 ms
minified.js
50 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
43 ms
polyfill.min.js
96 ms
js
217 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
13 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
18 ms
lodash.min.js
18 ms
react.production.min.js
17 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
64 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
17 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
185 ms
injector.min.js
399 ms
Now%20on%20Threads%20Banner_edited.png
376 ms
bundle.min.js
246 ms
Aesthetics%20Wix%20Background%20(1)_edited.png
317 ms
11062b_3923c929931f4d86a315128575e24fb1~mv2.jpg
317 ms
e82f34_28848fc4b45a4a598d20004664085b66~mv2.png
317 ms
Julia%20headshot%202_edited.jpg
401 ms
00449-20230713-CharlestonAesthetics-com-bc-2%20copy_JPG.jpg
318 ms
e82f34_5f388a58997247ef8fafeceb3b9dfc83~mv2.png
425 ms
e82f34_fded674b2bb34682b3ff2c57db3dca56~mv2.jpg
566 ms
e82f34_931ae2a29f7948aa97c2f3ba4d1b18ca~mv2.jpg
564 ms
e82f34_33c9fbedeaff4b65acc4aa1e2e1ec48e~mv2.jpg
968 ms
e82f34_00b8da0c12ca4f80bfc89f02d4028e0c~mv2.jpg
562 ms
e82f34_16b8aed4aacf4179b469219d63bec194~mv2.jpg
969 ms
e82f34_eb74cae31fc944419935b1baf210da6bf003.jpg
425 ms
Aesthetics%20Wix%20Background%20(1)_edited.png
563 ms
188 ms
loader.js
160 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
14 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1E1yysd0mg.woff
27 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSysd0mg.woff
37 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
36 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
27 ms
51v0xj5VPw1cLYHNhfd8ND8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
27 ms
-HJgNsTwx9qXGSxqew62RQ.woff
61 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
152 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
122 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
60 ms
178 ms
175 ms
175 ms
173 ms
169 ms
169 ms
312 ms
311 ms
309 ms
305 ms
300 ms
295 ms
call-tracking_7.js
30 ms
widget
50 ms
48 ms
icon
42 ms
runtime-es2015.884daf3ac6605b7bc0f6.js
56 ms
runtime-es5.884daf3ac6605b7bc0f6.js
54 ms
polyfills-es5.5f26f4ffcc2813eaed56.js
57 ms
polyfills-es2015.d1b6fd76755b41df2d45.js
50 ms
styles-es2015.950eb55b1c90e82dec66.js
55 ms
styles-es5.950eb55b1c90e82dec66.js
121 ms
main-es2015.aac55d03b247c7d2d21d.js
176 ms
main-es5.aac55d03b247c7d2d21d.js
193 ms
timezone-data-es5.758593271cefa80dd85d.js
174 ms
timezone-data-es2015.758593271cefa80dd85d.js
173 ms
wcm
15 ms
default_banner.png
55 ms
medium.png
150 ms
11-es5.40da6553f6da5d7b8ead.js
47 ms
cerapro-regular.woff
51 ms
cerapro-medium.woff
52 ms
cerapro-bold.woff
50 ms
14-es5.6e6f6789c7edeec359b4.js
15 ms
graph_client
84 ms
38 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
66 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
23 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
30 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
30 ms
charlestonaesthetics.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
charlestonaesthetics.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
charlestonaesthetics.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlestonaesthetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charlestonaesthetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charlestonaesthetics.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charleston Aesthetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: