Tools & Wizards About Us
charmingbag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

charmingbag.com

PP non woven bag,PP woven bag,Polyester bag,Croco Shopping bag,Non woven bag,Rpet Non woven bag,Bicycle bag,Tote bag,Paper bag,Beach mat,Garbage bag,D...

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

450 ms

charmingbag.com screenshot

About Website

Visit charmingbag.com now to see the best up-to-date Charming Bag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about charmingbag.com

Wenzhou Charming Gifts&Crafts Co.,Ltd is one of the manufacturer and supplier of PP non woven bag,PP woven bag,Polyester bag,Croco Shopping bag,Non woven bag,Rpet Non woven bag,Bicycle bag,Tote bag,Pa...

Visit charmingbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charmingbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charmingbag.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

charmingbag.com

1305 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

191 ms

ScrollPic.js

140 ms

lang.js

140 ms

public.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Charmingbag.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Charmingbag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Charmingbag.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 26.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 67.3 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charming Bag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 43.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charmingbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (37%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

43

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charming Bag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

charmingbag.com

charmingbag.com

1305 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

191 ms

ScrollPic.js

ScrollPic.js

140 ms

lang.js

lang.js

140 ms

public.css

public.css

162 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

159 ms

script.js

script.js

153 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

84 ms

13851118.jpg

13851118.jpg

89 ms

94621821.jpg

94621821.jpg

406 ms

29583473.jpg

29583473.jpg

1300 ms

1_11.png

1_11.png

95 ms

2_01.png

2_01.png

89 ms

1_02.jpg

1_02.jpg

160 ms

1_03.jpg

1_03.jpg

159 ms

1_04.jpg

1_04.jpg

157 ms

1_05.jpg

1_05.jpg

246 ms

1_07.png

1_07.png

225 ms

1_06.jpg

1_06.jpg

229 ms

1_08.png

1_08.png

236 ms

1_09.png

1_09.png

292 ms

1_010.png

1_010.png

297 ms

1_11.jpg

1_11.jpg

313 ms

56196741.jpg

56196741.jpg

471 ms

1_19.png

1_19.png

362 ms

1_18.png

1_18.png

367 ms

73263635.jpg

73263635.jpg

470 ms

41921469.jpg

41921469.jpg

2297 ms

34185275.jpg

34185275.jpg

1208 ms

34661390.jpg

34661390.jpg

482 ms

18009109.jpg

18009109.jpg

1289 ms

31002274.jpg

31002274.jpg

1322 ms

91046137.jpg

91046137.jpg

1453 ms

48447049.jpg

48447049.jpg

1345 ms

1_13.jpg

1_13.jpg

1368 ms

left.jpg

left.jpg

1375 ms

1_15.jpg

1_15.jpg

1398 ms

s88143535.jpg

s88143535.jpg

1428 ms

s95643069.png

s95643069.png

1445 ms

s27800413.jpg

s27800413.jpg

1452 ms

s20859574.jpg

s20859574.jpg

1473 ms

s97666969.jpg

s97666969.jpg

1498 ms

s39034564.jpg

s39034564.jpg

1521 ms

right.jpg

right.jpg

1450 ms

1_20.jpg

1_20.jpg

1444 ms

1_21.jpg

1_21.jpg

3252 ms

1_25.jpg

1_25.jpg

1477 ms

1_22.jpg

1_22.jpg

2157 ms

1_23.jpg

1_23.jpg

3658 ms

1_24.jpg

1_24.jpg

2419 ms

1_17.jpg

1_17.jpg

1415 ms

1_29.jpg

1_29.jpg

1483 ms

1_26.jpg

1_26.jpg

1546 ms

1_27.jpg

1_27.jpg

1608 ms

1_28.jpg

1_28.jpg

1630 ms

1_30.jpg

1_30.jpg

1697 ms

1_31.jpg

1_31.jpg

1751 ms

1_32.jpg

1_32.jpg

1774 ms

g1.jpg

g1.jpg

1837 ms

g2.jpg

g2.jpg

1868 ms

g3.jpg

g3.jpg

1871 ms

g4.jpg

g4.jpg

1894 ms

g5.jpg

g5.jpg

1907 ms

g6.jpg

g6.jpg

1203 ms

g7.jpg

g7.jpg

1142 ms

g8.jpg

g8.jpg

1166 ms

g9.jpg

g9.jpg

1157 ms

g10.jpg

g10.jpg

1155 ms

g11.jpg

g11.jpg

1173 ms

g12.jpg

g12.jpg

1174 ms

prev.png

prev.png

1177 ms

next.png

next.png

1188 ms

SEO Factors

charmingbag.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charmingbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Charmingbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

charmingbag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charming Bag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: