Tools & Wizards About Us
check56.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

check56.com

查询物流 – 物流查询及电商导购辅助平台-官网首页

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

546 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

103 ms

check56.com screenshot

About Website

Visit check56.com now to see the best up-to-date Check 56 content for Hong Kong and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about check56.com

check56.com

Visit check56.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Check56.com page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

check56.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.5

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

check56.com

546 ms

jquery.js

1245 ms

style.css

1260 ms

stencil.css

1027 ms

2882802.js

534 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Check56.com, 73% (8 requests) were made to 4.cn and 9% (1 request) were made to Libs.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source 4.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.7 kB (28%)

Content Size

213.7 kB

After Optimization

154.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Check56.com main page is 213.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 108.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 4.7 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 97.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Check 56 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 40.3 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 81.5 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Check56.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check 56. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

check56.com

check56.com

546 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1245 ms

style.css

style.css

1260 ms

stencil.css

stencil.css

1027 ms

2882802.js

2882802.js

534 ms

a-pic.jpg

a-pic.jpg

455 ms

a-header-bg.jpg

a-header-bg.jpg

228 ms

a-banner.jpg

a-banner.jpg

681 ms

icon.png

icon.png

454 ms

a-content-bg.jpg

a-content-bg.jpg

686 ms

a-pic.jpg

a-pic.jpg

461 ms

Accessibility Review

check56.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

check56.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

check56.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Check56.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Check56.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

check56.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Check 56. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: